COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

What did CPS do for abused kids? Let caseworker date dad

May 12, 2007


She was supposed to be the last line of protection for three kids who had long been terrorized and beaten by their father. She was supposed to be the one person in this world who would look out for them when no one else gave a damn.

She was, after all, a case manager with Child Protective Services, the official assigned by the state of Arizona to watch over these three Tucson children and keep them safe.

Instead, confidential documents suggest that Amy Gile actually helped an abusive father hang onto his kids, and later ignored the oldest child's plea for help. By then, she had become the abusive father's girlfriend. advertisement

So what, you might ask, did CPS do about it when one of the children showed up at day care in 2004 covered with welts and the story of Gile's romantic relationship became known?

Nothing.

"An investigation was conducted by our human resources staff," said CPS spokeswoman Liz Barker Alvarez. "We found no merit to the allegations because any alleged relationship between the parties involved in the complaint occurred over one year after his initial involvement with CPS ended."

Alvarez said that the agency found no evidence that Gile failed to report abuse.

Even if that's true - and the records suggest it may not be - I've got to wonder what goes on in an agency that permits its caseworkers to date their assigned child's abusers as long as they first get a judge to close the case? And how it is that this worker, now a supervisor, can still be overseeing cases when the report suggests she took no action when told of continued abuse?

While the CPS brass is apparently unfazed, the case has infuriated caseworkers familiar with the situation, and a state legislator is adding it to the list a House committee plans to investigate this summer. As he should. CPS for too long has been able to operate out of public sight, aided by state laws that render virtually everything the agency does a secret in the name of protecting children.

Rep. Jonathan Paton, R-Tucson, says CPS shouldn't be allowed to brush off such outrages because the law allows the agency to hide from prying eyes.

"Every other government agency has scrutiny over it," he said. "They are not protected by the kinds of protections that CPS has. And I believe that when you have those kind of protections in place, you're ripe for abuse."

Gile didn't return a call for comment but claimed in the records that she did nothing wrong and that the children lied.

According to the CPS records, which date from the 2004 incident reported by the day-care center, the father admitted having an extensive history of assault, theft and drug use that landed him behind bars in California and Arizona. (The Arizona Republic is not publishing his name to protect the identity of the children.)

CPS reports on the family date to 1995 when the father punched his year-old daughter in the face. A later report suggested he picked up each of his young children by their faces during a family fight.

In 2000, the children were put into foster care because they were dirty, appeared to be malnourished and were going to neighbors asking for food.

The caseworker assigned the task of reuniting the kids with their father (the mother by then had been sent to prison for 10 years) was Gile.

In February 2001, the father was arrested for disorderly conduct and weapons violations. According to the records, his case manager supported his request for work furlough instead of straight jail so that he could continue working to get his kids back.

In April 2002, the children were returned to the father, though CPS retained legal custody. Four months later, the daughter showed up at her elementary school with bruises and swelling on her face. She told a counselor her father had hit her and told Tucson police that he hits all the kids with a belt. No criminal charges were brought.

"The city court prosecutor declined to issue charges against the father, saying it was in the 'best interests of the children and their overall family preservation,' " the CPS records say.

A CPS investigator, however, substantiated the abuse, though Gile would later say she believed the girl had lied. Just six weeks after the incident, the father was given legal custody, and CPS closed the case. While a judge would have had to approve the plan, CPS workers tell me that judges rely heavily on the case manager's input and that it would be rare for such a thing to happen without the case manager's OK.

Some are shocked that Gile didn't immediately yank the kids from the house after the father slugged his daughter. "I would have absolutely taken them out and probably said we're done with this person," one worker told me.

Too bad that didn't happen.

Two years later, in December 2004, the youngest of the three arrived at day care with nine or 10 bright red welts on his hip and leg along with a partial handprint on his hip. The boy told CPS, "My daddy whupped me." He told police that his father "made him lie on the bed with his hands clasped behind his back when he was hit with the belt," the CPS report says. This, for jumping on the bed.

Can you imagine the investigator's reaction when the child continued, saying that his dad "has a girlfriend and her name is Amy"?

Gile told the investigator that her "romantic relationship" with the father began in February 2004, 16 months after her CPS involvement with the family ended. But the daughter told authorities Gile had been her father's girlfriend for about two years, adding that the kids go to her house "almost every day."

"Amy works for CPS," the girl was quoted as saying. "She was our caseworker. She and Dad started dating then. It was right after the other case closed, they started dating. My dad met her at a park and brought her flowers and they've been dating ever since."

The three children told authorities that their father beats them with a belt and punishes them in a number of other ways, including grabbing them by the throat and pushing them against the wall. He also regularly swears at them and calls them "the baddest kids ever." The oldest child said he twice hit her with a belt while at Gile's house and that Gile "has spanked her brothers with a hairbrush when they 'pee in their pants.' "

The girl said she told Gile about the abuse once. " 'I told her I'm scared of my dad because he hits us,' " the investigator reported. "(The girl) said the girlfriend told her, 'It's alright, he just gets really mad' and that she looked 'scared' about what (the girl) had said."

Gile told the investigator that that conversation never happened and that she was unaware of any abuse, though she acknowledged that her boyfriend swears at his kids and forces the boys to wash their underwear in the toilet if they wet the bed.

"Ms. Gile denied ever seeing the father discipline the children and denied that she disciplines the children," the investigator wrote. "When this investigator said that the children are afraid to go home, Ms. Gile said she didn't understand why."

It was pretty clear to some people.

CPS records indicate the daughter was suffering from emotional abuse due to "maltreatment" by the father over a significant period of time. The preschooler showed signs of post traumatic stress disorder.

The investigator, in her report, called them "the most terrified children this investigator has interviewed."

She noted "significant physical abuse and psychological damage," adding that she believes the abuse was occurring even before the dismissal of the prior case that Gile oversaw. She singled out the oldest child, noting that she had repeatedly tried to tell people what was going on.

"Mostly recently, she has confided in the father's girlfriend," the investigator wrote. "Despite what are remarkable and heroic attempts by a child to get the attention of adults, nothing has been done to protect these children from the father."

The father pleaded guilty in 2005 to child abuse and was sentenced to three years of probation. CPS cleared Gile of any wrongdoing, apparently believing Gile's story over the investigator's report.

Alvarez won't say what happened to the kids but there are reports that they now are back with their father.

And Gile, the woman who didn't know why the kids would be scared to go home, is now a supervisor who oversees child-abuse cases.

Reach Roberts at (602) 444-8635. Read her blog at robertsblog.azcentral.com.

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008