COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Report: Third student targeted in shock-prank

February 9, 2008
By Tom Benner


BOSTON - A third emotionally disturbed student might have been an additional victim in an Aug. 26 skin-shock prank at a group home in Stoughton run by the Judge Rotenberg Education Center, a new state report says.

The report, by the Department of Social Services, reveals a 15-year-old boy from New York was present when employees administered dozens of shocks to two other students on the instructions of a prank caller posing as a supervisor.

The other two victims were a 19-year-old from Halifax, who was shocked 77 times, and a 16-year-old from Virginia, who was shocked 29 times.

The report, released shortly before 5 p.m. Friday, said the 15-year-old had been an intended victim but was inconclusive about whether he was given wrongful skin shocks at the direction of the prank caller. DSS Commissioner Angelo McClain declined through a spokesman to comment further. A criminal investigation by the Norfolk County District Attorney is ongoing.

School spokesman Ernie Corrigan said the report is vague about whether the third student had been subject to abuse or neglect.

The report supports one of two allegations of physical abuse by two JRC staff members, and 15 allegations of neglect by eight staff members.

Seven employees were fired in October for their involvement in the incident after an initial state investigation found a series of errors and missteps by the staff.

Critics of the Canton-based school - the only one in the country believed to use skin shocks to punish misbehavior - say the report is further proof that so-called aversive therapy at the school is cruel and inhumane.

‘‘It’s another agency supporting what I’ve been saying all along: this place is out of control,’’ said Sen. Brian A. Joyce, a Milton Democrat seeking to pass legislation banning or restricting the use of electric skin shocks.

The school has more than 200 students, most of whom are mentally retarded, autistic or emotionally disturbed. School officials say the treatments are used in a minority of cases, and only with parental, medical, psychiatric and court approval

In the early morning hours of Aug. 26, a former student phoned one of the school’s group homes in Stoughton and posing as a supervisor, ordered the students to be given shocks.

The Aug. 26 incident was recorded by video cameras. Rotenberg center officials destroyed copies of the tape despite an order by state investigators to preserve them.

Tom Benner may be reached at tbenner@ledger.com .

Copyright 2008 The Patriot Ledger Transmitted Saturday, February 09, 2008

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008