COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

The Punishment Did Not Fit the Crime: Martin Lee Anderson
March 20, 2006
by Isabelle Zehnder

I read a post on a website where someone said they thought the Florida Juvenile Justice system is one of the best, that they reform children. But I believe there are plenty of parents who would disagree with that statement, from what I have read and from what I have been told. Please feel free to send your comments to info@caica.org.

Martin Lee Anderson did get into mischief and did need to be disciplined. But, I believe we can all agree that he did not deserve to die for his teenage pranks.

The punishment Martin received did not fit the crime!

Martin Lee Anderson’s parents had a choice – to send their child to a detention center or a boot camp - his mom chose the boot camp close to home; never did she think that within hours of his arrival there he would be killed by those who were there to help him.

Never did she think he would be pulled out of line, taken by a group of guards, beaten to death while a nurse watched. Never did she think she would receive the call that all parents dread, that her child had died. And the shock to learn he died at the hands of those there to help him.

It is hard to imagine how this mother felt when she watched a small portion of the video, too broken up to watch the rest. And how might she have felt when it came time to make the decision to exhume her baby’s body for a second autopsy? I cannot even fathom how she must have felt, and I doubt most of us can.

The Palm Beach Post did a Commentary: Boot Camp Beating Leaves Jarring Image. Here are excerpts from that article:

[Some things just get to you, straight to the heart, and this is one of them:

The videotape of 14-year-old Martin Lee Anderson, knees buckling, falling to the ground, gasping for breath.

Martin Lee Anderson, dying.

Anderson died after running laps and collapsing at a sheriff's boot camp near Panama City. The boy apparently complained of shortness of breath, but camp instructors egged him on, roughly insisting he continue.

A boot camp videotape later obtained by attorney Benjamin Crump shows the horrible treatment of Martin Lee Anderson.

"They started doing all these illegal maneuvers," said Crump, the attorney for the boy's parents. "Knee in the back. Pressure points behind his ears. Takedowns, which look like body slams to me."

Crump said it went on for 40 minutes. Anderson died the next day at the hospital.

The case is back in the news this week after they exhumed Anderson's body and redid the autopsy. The original medical examiner's report said Anderson, a healthy boy at 5-feet-9 and 140 pounds, suffered internal bleeding, pulmonary swelling, lacerations on his scalp and cut and swollen lips. Anderson was not the perfect child, and it was during a long afternoon at church ... Anderson, his younger sister, a cousin and two friends left services in his grandmother's car ... There was an accident, and police came ... the boy's grandmother didn't want to file charges, but "they told her she wouldn't get any money for her car unless she signed the papers," ...

Grand theft auto. All five of them, he says. Anderson was on probation the night he left his job at Burger King ... clearly against the rules, and when he was caught, he was charged with trespassing, a violation of his probation ... His parents ... were given a choice.

They could send him to a juvenile detention center in Jacksonville or Daytona Beach, or a sheriff's boot camp 10 minutes from his mother's Panhandle home. They chose the boot camp.

"... Anderson liked rap music, made the honor roll and had recently joined the chess team at school. But he was a kid, sometimes feisty about the rules. "He was an average little boy. No greater, no less," ... Crump said. It's hard to watch the final images of that average little boy.

... Why would someone do these things to a 14-year-old child?] click here for full article.

"Why Would Anyone Do Something Like that to a 14-Year Old Child"?

And that truly is the question here: why would anyone do something like that to a 14-year old child, to any child, for that matter?

Think about this. The punishment did not fit the crime. There are people in prisons, some on death row for years, for brutal murders and a myriad of other hideous crimes. There is a process - they have their day in court and they have a voice. The death penalty is not easily decided upon and does not occur frequently.

Yet Martin was handed a death penalty of sorts. Why? Because some guards and a nurse who appears to have cared less what happened to Martin made the decision for him. They beat the life right out of Martin. Parents will be up in arms, and should be up in arms, about this issue.

Martin Lee Anderson and his family had no choice – the state of Florida made the choice they were going to lock him up for his misdeeds.

When Parents Do Have a Choice

Sometimes things get out of hand and parents feel they are not equipped to deal with their troubled child or teen. So they seek outside assistance. Some start, usually, with their own family doctor or pediatrician, and then move to therapists, psychiatrists, and so on.

Many professionals believe sending the child away to an institution is the best solution, rather than seeking help close to home and looking to repair the family unit. Usually, when there are problems with a child there are deeper problems within the family unit that need to be addressed. Sending a child hundreds or thousands of miles away from the family does not seem to be the solution.

"Building Families Up" or "Tearing Families Apart"?

Many programs tout they build families up. But time and time again parents and children have indicated it served to tear their families apart. Typically, by the time a family is ready to take such a drastic step as to send their child away to a facility hundreds or thousands of miles from home to live with complete strangers, sometimes going to such extremes as hiring a teen "escort" service to basically abduct their child from their bed in the middle of the night, something is terribly wrong.

But does the problem lie only with the child or teen who is acting out? Or do deeper problems lie within the home environment that so desperately need repair? Most often times the latter is the case. It seems unfair that the child is the one removed from the home and placed into an environment where he or she loses virtually all of his or her rights. Where they are basically locked up and where they lose contact with the outside world.

I think that most people who have been affected by this industry in a negative way, and who are well aware of the abusive practices that occur, are going to speak out and want reform. The children deserve our support. It is for the children who have been abused, the children who have been neglected, and the children who have died that we voice our concerns.

Children, once locked behind closed doors, have no voice so it is incumbent upon us to be their voice.

Isabelle Zehnder

 

 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010