COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

More students testify in Hinton case : Boy claims he was slammed against wall

August 28, 2007
By Vic Vela


Day two of the Randall Hinton trial featured testimony from four former Royal Gorge Academy students who testified the boarding school’s co-director was physically abusive toward them, as well as other students.

The most compelling testimony provided Tuesday was by a 15-year-old Riverside, Calif., boy who detailed an alleged incident where he was put into a headlock and slammed against a staircase wall by Hinton.

“He thrust my head into the wall, my face hit the wall, and I fell to the ground,” said the boy.

According to the boy’s testimony, it was his refusal to wear a pair of sandals while with Hinton as the two were inside the school’s lobby that caught the ire of the defendant.

“He grabbed me by my left arm and pulled me into the staircase and said, ‘You don’t get it, do you?’” the boy testified.

Hinton then carried the boy up a flight of stairs by the boy’s head, his “tiptoes touching the ground sometimes,” the boy said.

The boy was then escorted to his room and given a pack of frozen peas to reduce the swelling on one of his eyes — which he said was “almost swollen shut,” according to his testimony. The boy said the defendant “made me put my face on the ground on top of the ice and stepped on the back of my head and pressed my face against the (frozen peas package).”

The boy said the incident occurred on the heels of a botched escape plan, one which the boy said he stole a kitchen knife and hid it in a drawer in his room as part of a plan to “unscrew a window at night and run away.”

The boy said the incident occurred sometime in April 2006, during his month-and-a-half long stay at the school.

Meanwhile, a 17-year-old Highlands Ranch girl on several occasions broke down in tears as she recalled her first encounter with Hinton.

The girl said she refused to go to bed during her first night at the school and would not leave a staff members’ table following requests by Hinton that she do so.

“He said, ‘If you don’t move, I’m going to help you move’,” the girl testified. “He meant what he said.”

The girl said “it was one of the most painful things I had to go through” when she said Hinton “grabbed (her) right arm and whipped it around her back.”

However, defense attorney Michael Gillick wasn’t buying the girl’s account of the alleged incident involving his client.

The girl was indignant when Gillick reminded her of her actions at the school. The girl said she was “screaming and cussing out staff” and “was throwing a big fit” the night her mother dropped her off at the boarding school.

The girl admitted she contemplated drinking shampoo just to “get out of there.” She also hit herself in the head with a stapler and attempted to staple one of her fingers in an effort to make the staff think she was “crazy.” The girl also admitted to attempting to run away from the school.

During cross-examination, the girl had a difficult time recalling specific details of the abuse, including not being able to recall kicking staff members as they tried to restrain her or which staff members were present during that time to begin with. She also did not recall “slapping her mother” for taking her to the school, something Gillick indicated had happened.

Two other boys testified regarding a separate incident in which they and one other boy ran away from the school, but were caught by Hinton and other staff members.

A 16-year-old Bloomington, Minn., boy testified that when he and his peers were caught near the hogback hills following the attempted escape, the defendant made the boys lie face down on the ground, near a red ant hill.

“They were crawling on our face and we were blowing them off,” said the boy.

The boy said one of his peers was demanded by Hinton to stop blowing ants off of his face.

“(Hinton) took the back of his head and forced it down into the ground just to make him stop blowing off the ants,” the boy testified.

After being taken back to the school, Hinton forced the boys to lay face down on the floor inside one of the dorm rooms. One boy, a 17-year-old from Long Beach, Calif., said Hinton denied his request to get up after complaining of stomach pains.

“I finally got up to my knees and threw up twice,” said the boy. “It hurt so bad, my whole body was numb.”

As has been the case during each of the former students’ testimony, Gillick attempted to highlight behavioral problems that led their parents to bring their children to the school in the first place — such as drug use, fighting and “histories of lying.”

Hinton faces seven counts of third-degree assault and two counts of false imprisonment. Each charge is a misdemeanor, though, if convicted, Hinton could face jail time.

Prosecution testimony will continue today, with the defense expected to begin presenting its case shortly after.

Vic Vela can be reached at vvela@ccdailyrecord.com.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008