COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Property values cited as board rejects teen treatment center

January 6, 2007
Associated Press

BENJAMIN — After neighbors complained about their property values and safety, a Utah County board rejected a request to build a residential drug-treatment center for teen boys.

"I'm out there at night irrigating. You think I'm going to carry a gun? Well, I will if that home gets built," Blake Huff said.

The Journey Blazing New Trails LLC wants to move from Provo. Program director Madolyn Liebing said the boys, 12 to 18, do not have histories of violent behavior, sex offenses or serious mental-health issues and are placed in the program by judges.

She said the company wants to move outside Provo so the boys can do more farm work. In nearly two years, Liebing said, there have been no incidents of boys causing problems for neighbors. Four ran away. "I think we've got a real safe, solid program. We're having a real impact on these boys' lives and hopefully making them better citizens," she said.

That didn't satisfy many people who appeared at the Board of Adjustment meeting. Opponents submitted 10 letters from real-estate professionals who said the treatment center would have a negative impact on property values. A home that is near a drug-treatment center likely will sell for less than an identical home located elsewhere, said Holly Davis, a mortgage underwriter. "It does discourage a certain percentage of buyers," she said.

On a 3-1 vote, board members Randy Christiansen, Lyle Hillier and Richard Dalebout voted to deny the zoning exception that would have allowed the treatment center. "I guess I'm not satisfied that there's enough information before us to address the issue that there's no negative impact on property values," Christiansen said.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008