COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 


BOY GOT BAGGED FOLKS BLAST SCHOOL 'BODY SOCK'

January 28, 2007
By CATHY BURKE


 


A Florida family is outraged over a teacher's use of a big, baggy "body sock" to calm their 4-year-old son after he went on a crying jag in class.

Patrick Holt, of Pinellas Park, has since yanked his son from Pinellas Central Elementary and claims he never gave permission for teachers to place the boy in the Lycra pillowcase-like sack in mid-December.

"I don't like it at all," Holt said at the time. "I don't think it should be used on anybody."

But Pinellas County Schools spokeswoman Andrea Zahn last week called the body sock an "institutional tool" that "has nothing to do with discipline."

"We have learned from a local report that he is considering legal action," she told The Post. "The matter has been internally investigated through our professional-standards office . . . which found that the two employees were acting within accepted procedures of the school board."

Holt told local media his boy was crying when he was put into the body sock.

"My wife saw my son try to open up the body sock, and the teacher's aide went ahead and had him put it back up," Holt said.

After the family complained, a teacher wrote in the boy's daily journal: "In reference to the body sock; it was not used for disciplinary reasons. It is used as a tool for calming children down," the teacher wrote, according to local cable news station Bay News 9's Web site.

"The verbal warnings given to [the boy] prior to its use were not working. If I wanted to 'discipline' him, he would've been in timeout."

The manufacturers claim the body sock helps kids explore three-dimensional space. Some therapists use the device for autistic children.

Holt's son is not disabled.

The county school board last week backed the use of the device.

"Teachers behaved in an appropriate manner in responding to a situation where a student needed to be calmed down for the safety and security of all the students in the classroom," Zahn said.

The school board said the teachers admitted the parents had not previously been aware of the body sock or its use.

Efforts to reach the Holts were not successful.

 


UPDATE ON THE USE OF THE "BODY SOX" IN FLORIDA SCHOOL DISTRICT

Pinellas County School Board: body sock used correctly

January 24, 2007


More information:


The teacher wrote this note and another one to explain to explain why she used the body sock on the 4-year-old. The Pinellas County School Board has released the results of its investigation into the use of a body sock on a 4-year-old boy.

The report, released Monday, said a boy who was put into the body sock was out of control and the body sock was the best way to calm him down.

Body sox are meant for autistic children or for those with learning disabilities, but the 4-year-old is not learning disabled.

The boy's father, Patrick Holt, said a body sock was used as punishment on his son without his permission.

"I don't like it at all," Holt said. "I don't think it should be used on anybody."

But the school board's investigation says the body sock was used correctly.

"Teachers behaved in an appropriate manner in responding to a situation where a student needed to be calmed down for the safety and security of all the students in the classroom," said Pinellas County School Board spokeswoman Andrea Zahn.

The district said it will continue to use body sox on any child.

"By the manufacturer's own design they are a multi-use type of instructional tool," Zahn said.

The Holts said they strongly disagree with the board's findings and have hired an attorney. They are considering suing the school board and the teachers.

The school board said the parents were not aware that body sox could be used on their son, but they plan to include the possible use of the device in orientation next year.

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008