COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

CAICA

COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE


Compelling film about teen rehabs gone bad – Part 3
Parents desperate for help

Over the GW
–an advocate’s point of view 

May 28, 2007
By Isabelle Zehnder ©
www.caica.org  

I am honored to have been one of the first to see Director Nick Gaglia’s profound film, Over the GW - a film about a world that existed a few years ago just over the George Washington Bridge in New Jersey when Nick was a teen. A world that, sadly, still exists today  I. Zehnder


As mentioned in Compelling film about teen rehabs gone bad, part 1, Over the GW is a poignant film directed by Nick Gaglia that is based on a real life experience in a cult-like rehab center that preys on vulnerable teens and their parents – programs that are still widespread. It is a frightening look at what went on behind closed doors then - and sadly - what goes on behind closed doors today.

The actors of the film did an excellent job at capturing the essence of what youth endured at KIDS, Inc., New Jersey, a spin-off of Straight, Inc.

Parents desperate for help

Parents by the thousands are sending their teens, pre-teens, and children to facilities and programs away from home. I'm not talking about summer camp. I'm talking about residential programs for kids that last anywhere from a year to over five years. Parents sometimes questions if they've made the right decision. 

The Ronald and Nancy Reagan “Just Say No” anti-drug movement of the 70’s and 80’s may have started out with good intentions.  But, instead of rehabilitating and helping kids and teens, many were brainwashed, abused, and neglected by the very people who were supposed to be there to help them. There were no laws in place to regulate the industry - it was pretty much a free-for-all. Eventually most of the abusive programs were shut down on allegations of child abuse and neglect.

This is far from over as today not much has changed. While there are some good, therapeutic, and safe programs for children and teens, as there were then, there still exists a problem that touches the lives of what many believe to be tens of thousands of families each year.

A new industry evolved in the 90’s that took the world by storm. Yet most people do not even know it exists. It has become a multi-billion dollar a year industry estimated to house hundreds of thousands of children into its programs each year. While most programs are located in the US, some US-based companies have opened facilities overseas. Four countries have shut down American programs housing American children run by American businessmen.

Some people call this the "Teen-Help" industry, some call it the "Teen-For-Hire" industry, while others call it the "Troubled-Teen" industry. It doesn't really matter much what it's called. What matters is that most people are not aware it exists. Most people are not aware that children and teens all over this country are being awoken in the middle of the night by strangers, often being placed into handcuffs, then transported to facilities hundreds and thousands of miles from home. These kids don't know what's happening to them and many have indicated the experience has left them with Post Traumatic Stress and with a lack of trust for adults. Many parents have admitted their children were not in trouble with the law, many were not even involved in drugs or alcohol, and many really didn't have any significant issues. Some parents were just not in a position to keep their kids at home and found what they thought to be an easy answer. Many learned that they got a whole lot more than they bargained for. Many of their kids were abused, neglected, and some have died.

The fact that an industry exists that houses tens of thousands of youth each year into facilities and programs, that this industry is completely unregulated, that there are no Federal guidelines, that there is no outside entity overlooking its operations, and that they often hire uneducated, untrained, unqualified, and uncertified staff is not only frightening but it's a recipe for disaster, in my opinion.

Many facilities do not have any medical staff on board, yet they are taking kids who have disabilities and special needs. Many do not even have a psychologist on board and do not even offer therapy. Some allow social workers to evaluate children and teens and to randomly decide a child no longer has a diagnosis, and therefore no longer needs his or her medications. How can a social worker make the determination that a child who was diagnosed by a qualified licensed medical professional suddenly no longer has ADHD, Bipolar, or Oppositional Defiance Disorder? How can this social worker take the child off all of his or her medications without consulting with a medical doctor?

Buyer Beware

Many of today’s parents are paralyzed in fear that their children will make all the wrong choices and will end up on drugs or worse, will end up dead. Why have so many turned to the Internet for help, and why have they allowed complete strangers with no expertise or credentials to evaluate their child via a questionnaire on the Internet?

In an effort to see how these programs operate, a fellow-advocate contacted one of the 800 numbers she found on the Internet and asked if they could help her locate a program that she could then recommend to parents of children with ADHD. She was told to fill out an online evaluation questionnaire and that she would be contacted via e-mail. She was a bit surprised but did as she was told. To her dismay, she received an e-mail with a full evaluation of her son. She had no son, she indicated on the form she was inquiring about a group of kids with ADHD.

Why have parents allowed themselves to be lulled into believing someone else can turn their child around, when often their child or teen is doing nothing more than behaving like a normal child or teen? Why have parents lost confidence in their own parenting abilities? Why are they so readily signing their children into programs and facilities hundreds and thousands of miles from home without even visiting the place themselves?

Parents have spent years teaching their children to stay away from strangers. So why do parents allow themselves to be convinced that it is in their child’s best interest to hire a child/teen transport company to remove their child or teen from their home? What could they possibly have said to these parents to convince them it’s OK to have complete strangers enter the child’s room in the middle of the night and to then force the child to get dressed in front of them? How can parents believe it is in their child’s best interest to sign away their parental rights and to allow these strangers complete power over their kids? Parents are signing contracts giving transporters permission to use handcuffs or pepper-spray on their child, should they deem it necessary.

Once the children have been transported to their destination they are placed in the hands of more strangers. Strangers their parents have never met, and often never even talked to over the phone. Most oftentimes the parents have spoken only to the marketing agent they found on the Internet. When the dust settles parents are left with a 58-page contract they’ve signed but often never read. It doesn’t settle well with them when they see they’ve signed a contract that states the program can transport their child to a facility in another country at the parent’s expense, should the program deem it necessary. Yet they are on some level powerless to even bring this up. Usually, all of this has occurred in a matter of days and the parents’ heads are spinning. They wonder if they’ve done the right thing.

Just when they begin to wonder if they’ve done the wrong thing they get a call from the program telling them their child is doing great. After having had a night to think things over parents often want to speak to their child to know the child is OK and has survived the ordeal. They are abruptly told they will most likely not speak to their child for another three months or so. Most parents are left speechless, asking why? Why can’t I talk to my child for three months? The answer? Because your child is manipulative and will try to convince you to bring him home. While most parents are not happy with that answer, most go along with it. We’ve heard of parents who have not spoken to their child for 18 months or more and we have to wonder, why?

 

Compelling film about teen rehabs gone bad – Part 1
Over the GW –an advocate’s point of view (click here)

Compelling film about teen rehabs gone bad – Part 2
Don’t get stung by WWASPS – it’s easier than you think
Over the GW –an advocate’s point of view (click here)

Compelling film about teen rehabs gone bad – Part 3
Parents desperate for help

Over the GW
–an advocate’s point of view (click here)

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008