COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

No more shock therapy for D.C. special education youth

March 5, 2008
By Michael Neibauer


WASHINGTON - The D.C. Council wants to end the District’s long-term practice of placing youth in special education facilities that practice shock and other potentially painful therapies.

Legislation introduced Tuesday comes in response to the dispatching of dozens of D.C. youth to the Judge Rotenberg Center, a shock-therapy clinic in Canton, Mass.

The Examiner has written extensively about abuses at Rotenberg, recently detailing an incident in which three students were repeatedly shocked in error after clinic staff fell for a prank. Four D.C. students remain in the facility today, Attorney General Peter Nickles said Tuesday, though the District “is moving heaven and earth” to get them out.

Under the bill, the Office of the State Superintendent of Education would be barred from consigning students to any school that uses “aversive education techniques,” including noxious, painful and intrusive stimuli that cause pain, withholding meals, electric shock, pinches and deep muscle squeezes, and chemical restraints.

“These are some of the things that are not prohibited at this time,” said Ward 3 D.C. Councilwoman Mary Cheh.

Rotenberg is the only school in the country authorized to use electric shock and other therapy on mentally ill and disabled patients and children. It charges the District more than $227,000 per child per year for its services.

Cheh has described Rotenberg’s practice as “abuse.”

The school is under a criminal investigation for the episode in which a prankster ordered its staff to hook up three wards to electric shock machines in the middle of the night. Two students were shocked at least 77 times.

Rotenberg officials say the “aversive” therapy is more effective on mentally ill children than psychotropic drugs. But Council Chairman Vincent Gray argued shock therapy has no long-term impact on student behavior.

“It’s astounding that in the 21st Century, in 2008, we still have programs that are using aversive conditioning, with anyone frankly,” Gray said.

All 13 council members backed the bill. Gray said he would move quickly to hold hearings and adopt the legislation into law.

Fast facts

» About 2,200 special-ed students are placed in out-of-city facilities.

» D.C. spends upward of $200 million a year on the placements.

» Vincent Gray: Bringing students home “makes extraordinary human sense.”

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008