COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 



Shock treatment of student appalls officials

TAUNTON - Shock therapy for special education students, and the district's willingness to pick up the tab, fell under heavy debate before last night's regular School Committee meeting.
 
Over the past three years, the committee has been unwittingly approving treatment for at least two students at the Canton-based Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, which has been under the microscope recently for its controversial methods of behavioral treatment and aversion therapy.

Committee member and former Taunton middle school principal Richard J. Faulkner raised his concerns with using the center, quoting recent stories in the media exposing the school's methods.

"I will not vote for this in the future," Faulkner said, voicing his absolute opposition to electric shock and other aversion therapy techniques. "I don't think we can stop it for now, but maybe we can revise our policy for the future."

The district is paying more than $18,000 per month - more than $200,000 annually - to send a 20-year-old student to the center, where he got shock treatment therapy as recently as three months ago, according to Suzanne M. Shaw, the city's newly hired director of special education.

Shaw traveled to the center to see its facilities and treatments, especially as they related to the Taunton student enrolled in the program.

"He's 20 years old and has been going there a long time," Shaw explained to the finance and law subcommittee.

Shaw said the young man's parents will "fight tooth and nail" to keep him in the Rotenberg program.

"I've spoken to his mom at great length," Shaw explained. "She told me how much he hurt himself and other people before [treatment at the center]. He now sits at home and eats with his family. He has not needed a shock for quite some time."

"It sounds like 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' to me," said school committee chairwoman Christine A. Fagan.

Other fairly extreme methods, punishments often equated with torture - such as food and sleep depravation - are also employed at the center, committee member Jordan H. Fiore pointed out.

Fiore noted that shock therapy was once an thriving and fully accepted means of behavioral control.

"Thirty or 40 years ago, it was state of the art," he said.

Faulkner compared it to other outdated medical methods of past centuries.

"Thank God we got out of bloodletting," he quipped.

"We allow one of our students to go there?" asked committee member Josephine B. Almeida. "It sounds like abuse to me."

But Superintendent Arthur W. Stellar said the school would be forced to spend more on legal fees to go against the parents' wishes and withdraw the student from the center.

The state Department of Education has urged districts to investigate their students' successes and failures in the program. Shaw said they mailed a bulky report of their own to the district for her review.

Although the therapy may seem cruel and unusual, Shaw was impressed with the facility's decor.

"It's one of the most beautiful facilities I've ever seen," she said. "It was gorgeous. There's a game room like something you'd find in Disney World, and they offer you a shock."

Faulkner said the issue should be brought before the entire committee for review in the near future.

Member Peter H. Corr, a former Taunton police officer, defended the parents' right to choose treatment for their son.

"Speaking for myself, I've seen people placed in padded cells," Corr said. "I know what can happen. If the parents agree to this, I no longer have second thoughts."

Faulkner offered a quick response, ending debate on the topic for the night.

"I don't like it," he said. "I just don't like it. When do the rights of the child come into play?"
 

rschuler@tauntongazette.com

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008