COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

How to Save a Troubled Kid: Avoid Reading Time magazine on Tough Love

November 16 2004

By: Maia Szalavitz

 

 

In a “state of the science” conference in October, the National Institutes for Health (NIH) released a consensus statement saying that tough treatments – including so-called “boot camps” for troubled teenagers – “do not work.” They also warned that “there is some evidence that they may make the problem worse rather than simply not working.” But in the November 22 issue of Time magazine, the “state of the science” is almost completely ignored in an account that highlights the positive aspects of a highly profitable tough love chain.

Time’s “How to Save a Troubled Kid?” focused on a teen with bipolar disorder, whose father said that the Montana-based Spring Creek Lodge program, a tough love program affiliated with the World Wide Association of Specialty Programs (WWASP), “improved his attitude and sense of responsibility.”

In an 1,800-word article, Time included just two sentences about the NIH’s findings. It didn’t explain, for instance, that years of research are summarized in NIH consensus statements, which are issued when the state of the science is believed to be good enough to draw basic conclusions about treatments.

And while Time acknowledged that WWASP had one program shut down in Mexico for abuse, the magazine failed to mention that WWASP has had at least five affiliates closed following reports of abuse and human rights violations. The Mexican government alone raided and closed three WWASP programs: Sunrise Beach, High Impact and Casa by The Sea.

At High Impact, police took video of teens housed outdoors in dog cages, which later aired on Inside Edition. The Costa Rican government shut Dundee Ranch Academy, reporting human rights violations. One official there told the media that “In Costa Rica, we don’t even allow that kind of punishment for our prison inmates,” citing the use of isolation rooms in which teens were made to kneel for hours.

The U.S. State Department documented abuse at WWASP’s Samoa facility, which closed following an investigation by the Samoan government. The Czech Republic also raided a WWASP facility there and documented abuse. Brightway Hospital, which WWASP ran in Utah, was closed after the state found licensing violations like failure to report abuse allegations. Congressman George Miller (D-California) has at least twice called on Attorney General John Ashcroft to investigate the program.

If the NIH had said a cancer or AIDS treatment provided by an organization with such a controversial history was ineffective and possibly harmful, would a reputable news organization counter with a story that focused instead on anecdotal claims that the treatment worked?

Stats Senior Fellow, Maia Szalavitz is the author of a forthcoming book investigating tough love treatments, to be published in 2005 by Riverhead Books.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008