COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

State to limit student electric shock therapy

BY KARLA SCHUSTER
Newsday Staff Writer

June 20, 2006
 
The use of aversive therapies such as electric shocks and food deprivation to treat troubled New York students would be limited and more closely monitored under a new state regulation approved by a Board of Regents panel yesterday.

The new rule, expected to be approved by the full Board of Regents today, would prohibit any facility, including those out-of-state, from treating New York students with more than one type of aversive therapy at the same time (for example restraining a child and then shocking them). The ban, which also would cover automated devices such as those that shock a child every time they get out of a chair, would take effect on Friday.

"We didn't feel like binding and gagging a kid and then giving him an electric shock was consonant with best education policy," said Roger Tilles, the regent from Long Island. "We believe that there are real reasons for institutions that are doing aversive therapies without the proper safeguards to stop immediately."

Also, the Regents panel recommended a new monitoring program for the use of aversive therapy on New York students.

The case of all students now receiving such therapy would be reviewed by a new state panel which would make a recommendation to local school district officials by Oct. 1. The final decision on whether aversive treatment continues after that would remain up to the local district. In cases where the therapy continues, students' treatment would be reviewed every six months.

The action by the Regents comes less than a week after the state released a scathing site review of a controversial Massachusetts facility - the Judge Rotenberg Center - that uses electric shock therapy on its students. New York State sends about 155 students with severe emotional problems to Rotenberg, at a cost of about $50 million per year.

Among the state's findings were that the center sometimes used more than one aversive treatment at a time - strapping students to a wooden board before shocking them.

A Freeport woman, Evelyn Nicholson, is suing the state for placing her teenage son at the Rotenberg Center, saying his treatment amounted to abuse. Antwone Nicholson is now being treated at a facility in Westchester, and is no longer receiving aversive therapy. Also, the center is under investigation in Massachusetts for several abuse complaints.

Officials said yesterday the proposed new regulation was not specifically targeted at the Rotenberg Center, but rather part of an ongoing effort to better regulate the treatment of severely disabled students placed in private facilities that use aversive therapy. They said other private facilities also use aversive therapies, but Rotenberg is the only one in the nation using electric shocks for behavior modification.

"We've never had any standards or requirements in place for using what should be a very unusual and very extreme form of treatment," said deputy state Education Commissioner Rebecca Cort. Officials from the Rotenberg Center could not be reached for comment yesterday. Last week, they called the state's report biased and denied its findings. On Friday, the center turned documents, including student records, to the state to justify its use of aversive therapy.

Cort said a recommendation on whether to keep Rotenberg on New York's list of approved out-of-state facilities would not be made until a final report is complete.

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008