COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 


 
Readers' reactions: Marcus Fiesel

September 7, 2006

Marcus Fiesel's tragic end has touched people throughout Greater Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky.

Hundreds of people had turned out to search for the boy, when he was reported missing from Juilfs Park on Aug. 15. They were saddened to learn he was dead. His foster parents have been charged with murder in the case.

Dozens of people have written letters to the editor, commenting and suggesting changes. Some have written columns.

Click the links at right for earlier readers' reactions, and read these letters from Sept. 7:

Foster families need reform, more support
As the mother of an 8-year old non-verbal child with autism, I can tell you smeared feces, running off and exhaustion are often part of a “normal” day in even the best families. I can also tell you the federal, state and local support needed to help these children and their families is just not there.
Marcus didn’t have a good family life. But of all the children he lived with, he’s the only one dead.
I hope that Joe Deters, Michael Fox and other political figures start pushing for better supports for the families of children with autism as hard as they are for foster care reform. If appropriate supports had been in place, maybe Marcus would have never ended up with the Carrolls in the first place.
Carol Leach
Montgomery

Trevino should add self as lawsuit defendant
Donna Trevino is filing a lawsuit for wrongful death of that beautiful little boy. However, I don’t think she has included all the pertinent parties in the suit. Yes, the binding of this little boy that led to his death is reprehensible. And the guilty should be held accountable for their part in this crime. Perhaps the program for foster care needs to be overhauled to prevent this from happening again.
Missing from Trevino’s suit is the perhaps the one most guilty party of not doing right by Marcus is the mother herself. Had Marcus been cared for properly in her home, would he have been placed in foster care? Trevino should name herself as a defendant in her own suit to seek justice for Marcus.
Chris Massengale
Springfield Township

Make Trevino pay back taxpayers’ money
As expected, Donna Trevino, Marcus Fiesel’s birth mother, filed suit for wrongful death against Butler County and others for $5 million.
I believe that Butler, Clermont and Hamilton counties should all file accessory to murder charges against her. She had a child she wouldn’t and couldn’t care for properly. It’s her fault the poor child was placed into foster care in the first place.
She doesn’t belong in jail. She needs to foot the bill for the costs these three counties have incurred due to her incompetence as a mother. This should include the costs we taxpayers have had to pay and will have to pay for his foster care, the search for him in Juilfs Park, the investigation into his murder, and the trial and incarceration of the Carrolls. Unfortunately, this will never happen. She and her ambulance-chasing lawyer will get rich at our expense.
James Lewis
Withamsville

Put suit winnings toward helping kids
In regard to Donna Trevino’s spot on last night’s news and her counsel’s explanation about principle and about not wanting this to happen to other kids, how about this: If you want something done, have what they are suing for go to a government program to safely place “unwanted” children into responsible foster/adoptive homes.
Having your child, who was autistic, wandering the streets of Middletown, only to return the child and find the house littered with feces – is this what message you want to send? The boy somehow knew, through his less-than-normal development that he had to get to a better place; now he is.
Put the selfish initiatives of you and your lawyer looking at the 30 percent plus on the chance that you win. May God have shame upon you.
Brad Loomis
Harrison

Trevino should not be allowed to profit from death
If Donna Trevino gets even one penny from the lawsuit she is filing, there is something very wrong with the system. She should not get anything. She gave her child away. She should not be allowed to profit from the death of her son. She did not care about him when he was alive. The whole thing makes me sick.
Ann Mullins
Delhi Township

Shame all around if this suit is rewarded
The basic cause of Marcus Fiesel’s death is because his birth mother neglected herself and Marcus. If she would have cared for him correctly, he would not have been given up to foster care. She deserves our prayers and help to better her life, but she does not deserve any judgment that monetarily rewards her for that neglect that caused Marcus to be given up to foster care.
Shame on the lawyer, and shame on the courts and judge if she is rewarded. If it is not about the money, then give any money awarded in court in Marcus’ name to a fund for foster children.
Ronald Larbes
Sycamore Township

Our justice system needs ‘loser pays’
It’s bad enough that we find out David and Liz Carroll are accused of killing Marcus, and then trying to hide the evidence by burning the body. Now Donna Trevino (so-called mother) wants $5 million. If only we had “loser pays” in our justice system. Trevino should be ashamed!
Dallas Vanselow
Fairfield

Where was Trevino’s concern when boy was alive?
I feel sick when I think about Marcus Fiesel’s brief life and tragic death, but I feel even sicker, disgusted actually, that his birth mother is attempting to make a financial profit from his death. Where was this care and concern when Marcus was alive? Just because of some biological connection to Marcus that does not give her the right to exploit his death. If some agency is found negligent, the punitive damages should go into a fund to help prevent this kind of tragedy from happening again. No one should become richer because of it; in fact, as a community we are poorer for it.
Mary Lowstuter
Green Township

Scapegoat-hunting should start with Trevino
I read with much stupefaction that Marcus Fiesel’s biological mother is being permitted to sue the Butler County commissioners, Butler County Children Services, Lifeway For Youth foster care agency and the Carrolls.

What kind of world do we live in that this could happen? Wasn’t the ultimate reason Marcus Fiesel was with a foster family was because the child had been living in horrendous conditions and had been removed from the home?

Donna Trevino appears to be the forsaken, heartbroken mother of the year. Where was she when Marcus was found out wandering in the road? Where was she when the children were living in “very bad living conditions”? Where was she when Marcus fell out of a window? She seems to care an awful lot now. Why did she wait until Marcus died a horribly gruesome death?

I believe it would be a great injustice to Marcus and every other child that is fostered if this woman gets one penny from something that she herself ultimately caused. Everyone is frantically searching for someone or some agency to blame.
This scapegoat-hunting should immediately start with Trevino and end with Liz and David Carroll. If she had been a better mother to start with, Marcus would still be with us.
Carma Downs
Middletown

Deal with Baker was a necessary evil
I have real rage for what happened to Marcus. I can’t even read detailed descriptions of what it was like for him because it’s simply too much and makes me seethe with anger, then have feelings of sadness.

It is not pleasant that Amy Baker will go free, but it is a necessary evil. I have a hard time reading people say she was necessary for the case but shouldn’t go free. You, I, the prosecution would never have known what happened to Marcus if some type of deal wasn’t made with Baker. It’s the nature of evil; sometimes you have to make a deal with a devil to get a measure of justice.

I am not a fan of Joe Deters, but I don’t think he’s been clear about why Marcus should have not been placed with the Carrolls to begin with. It’s easy to say they should have never placed Marcus with them; he’s a politician and looks good saying it. I’m interested in solutions. I want concrete reasons that can be built upon for the future to prevent this from re-occurring.

I regret to say that if drastic changes aren’t made in the foster care system – be it more stringent and creative ways of placing children and more resources if needed – the outrage we feel for Marcus will have been in the end only for our own benefit.
Doug Stenger
Lebanon

Not charging Baker is travesty of justice
Now that indictments have been handed down against David and Liz Carroll, I am surprised that the press has not investigated the role of Amy Baker, the reported “girlfriend of both David and Liz Carroll.” Baker reportedly knew of little Marcus’ treatment. Yet, with all the investigations into how this terrible event happened, no one has raised the issue of why this woman walks free.

I understand that she assisted Joe Deters in order to save her own skin, but there surely can be some type of indictment for her role in this terrible crime, even if it is a reduced charge. There can be no justice for this poor child until the third party to this crime, Baker, is charged and held accountable for her actions. Anything less is a travesty of justice.
Fred Ross
Batavia

Cooler heads know most in system do their best
The sad and sordid story of the young life of Marcus Fiesel – and its tragic end – has resulted in an outpouring of community response from all quarters; nothing touches more people than the senseless death of an innocent child, and nothing is closer to home to most parents.

But unfortunately, not to all parents – in this 21st century reality that includes all too many unhealthy, neglected, and abused innocents facing horrible obstacles from birth. Some 29,000 Ohio children are involved in child welfare cases, with 19,000 currently in the foster care program. More than 4,000 of these are in Butler County, one of Ohio’s fastest growing areas.

In what requires far more skills than one can imagine, the delicate process of determining whether a child needs to be removed from a home temporarily or permanently, has special needs and is properly placed in a new foster home where the child can thrive goes on quietly every day.

In a world where budget constraints limit compensation, some of the real heroes of our society are the dedicated caseworkers whose passion to make our community a better place that really try to make a difference plug away every day as advocates for our children.

And in Butler County, we are truly well-served by the Butler County Children Services Board, chaired by Johnny Wade Sloan, and the executive director of Children Services, Jann Heffner. The improvement in services, in practices, and in delivery of quality support for our children – and yes, they are our children – is truly remarkable since the beginning of Heffner’s tenure three years ago.

But Marcus Fiesel represents a catastrophic failure – one that any thinking, committed person would want examined for what went wrong. No one would be more eager to address this tragedy than Sloan and Heffner – who already have demonstrated their community commitment, and have for years, far beyond the call of duty. They, more than anyone, would welcome constructive participation in a review of systems, practices, procedures and people to improve. It’s what they do every day – and have done so admirably over the past three years.

It should come as no surprise, in an election year, that among the voices being heard commenting on this tragic event are those running for office, or simply seeking news coverage for their opinions. Much of this is constructive – and welcome. However, there are those who would “politicize” this tragedy for personal gain, and would attempt to divert attention to the “blame game” to engage in finger-pointing, without a balanced review of consequences.

One child’s death is more important than any words. But the welfare of 4,000 others in Butler County cannot be thrown into a more risky environment simply to satisfy someone who may promise, mightily, that “heads will roll.” The bluster and the flame-throwers make things worse; political “Monday morning quarterbacking” has no place here. Real answers are needed, and people committed to the welfare of our children – not to self-aggrandize – are who should participate. Political grandstanding only slows the process of improvement.

People who really want to improve things will quietly volunteer their time, and they are always the people who make us all better. Bombastic political “gotcha” has no place here.

It is a serious problem – not a political football.
David Noonan
West Chester

Birth mother, foster parents deserve same as Marcus
I think it is terrible that the biological mother to little Marcus Fiesel be allowed to sue for the wrongful death of her son. She is no mother. If anything she should be brought up on charges for child neglect. I agree with what Joe Deters said, that if the foster parents or the biological mother had cared enough about the little boy, he would not be dead. None of them deserve to get any money from his death. They deserve the same punishment as they gave to Marcus.
Linda Mueller
Burlington

Taxpayers should be suing biological mom
Marcus Fiesel’s biological mother wants to blame Butler County for his tragic death. As taxpayers, how do we sue her for gross incompetence for having the county raise her son and thus costing taxpayers money? This is the type of lawsuit that gives lawyers a bad name; in this case justly so.
Robert Young
Milford

Money from suit should go to foster children
I am saddened to hear about Marcus Fiesel’s birth mother filing a lawsuit. I don’t understand why she should be awarded any money for abusing her children. She couldn’t take care of them in the first place, poor Marcus is dead, and now she wants money. I couldn’t agree more with Joe Deters – if Donna Trevino had taken care of Marcus from the get-go, Marcus would still be alive.

How about this idea? If Trevino is awarded even just a penny, let Trevino prove to us that it’s not about money; and if there is a judgment in her favor, the judge could order that the money must be used to set up a fund in Marcus’ memory to help the good foster parents financially, and the actual kids, to help put them through school, college, etc.

For a lot of these foster kids, once they reach age 18, they’re usually “on their own,” so let’s really help the ones who need it, the kids.
Patricia Rexford
Maineville

All who helped look for Marcus should sue Trevino
I, along with everyone else in the community, have watched and listened to the details in Marcus’ sad and short life. As he plays with the angels now, he is a happy little boy. Now the person who gave birth to him (I refuse to use the term mother) has decided to sue. She is suing the community that searched for him and mourned his death.

We should accept her suit, and anyone who spent their time searching and praying for Marcus should sue her. Anyone who missed a soccer practice or a family dinner should sue her. She is not this child’s mother; we are all his mothers and fathers. Without knowing him, we cared more for him than she ever did.
Mary Mueller
Hebron

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008