COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

WPR News Headlines

Prison Treatment Borders On Cruel And Unusual

By Gil Halsted
November 15, 2006

(UNDATED) A former inmate at Wisconsin’s Supermax prison has won a court victory. A federal appeals court yesterday ruled that the inmate’s claim of cruel and unusual punishment deserve a jury trial.

Nathan Gillis first filed suit in 2002 claming his constitutional rights had been violated by a guard at the Boscobel prison. His attorney, Pam McGillivray, says Gillis was subjected to a behavior modification program that included stripping him down to his underwear and forcing him to sleep on the floor and eat only nutriloaf for 12 days. The punishment was for violating a prison rule requiring inmates to sleep with their heads facing the rear of their cells. McGillivray says the purpose of program was to inflict punishment beyond what is already the worse punishment you can get in the state of Wisconsin at the discretion of that guard.

A lower court rejected his claim, but this week’s ruling compares the Boscobel prison to a Soviet gulag and grants Gillis’ Madison attorney McGillivray the right to present his case to a jury. She says this allows a jury to look at these conditions in which an inmate is held without clothing, without a mattress, without a blanket and without anything and determine whether that meets our standards of decency.

Prison officials told the court the Gillis got the punishment because he smeared blood and feces on the window of his cell. They also claim the severe isolation measures taken against Willis are no longer used at the prison.

McGillivray says if Gillis wins, it will send a message to other high-security prisons around the country about what the limits of severe punishment really are.

Gillis was serving time for rape committed in 1993 he has since been released and re-incarcerated for violating his parole.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008