COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Boot-camp lawsuit seeks $40M
Teen's parents blame officials for his death


Attorneys for Martin Lee Anderson's family file a lawsuit
Learn about a similar lawsuit in Texas

The parents of Martin Lee Anderson sued the Bay County Sheriff's Office and the Department of Juvenile Justice on Wednesday, seeking more than $40 million for the death of the teenager that prompted major legislative reforms this year.

The 52-page complaint filed in Leon County Circuit Court said the state and county were responsible for the 14-year-old's injuries - and for depriving him of proper medical care when he collapsed. The suit also said the state and county hired, supervised and trained guards at the boot camp and that DJJ showed "a deliberate indifference" toward the rights of young offenders.

The Panama City youth died Jan. 6, a day after boot-camp guards kneed and kicked him and shoved ammonia tablets up his nose. His mother, Gina Jones, father, Robert Anderson, and younger sister, Star, attended a news conference at their attorney's office in Tallahassee to announce the suit.

"It was the custom of the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice to inadequately and improperly hire, supervise and train its employees/agents, including the Bay County Sheriff's Office," attorney Benjamin Crump wrote in the petition.

The suit alleged negligence in the boy's death and violation of his rights. It said DJJ was responsible for allowing "a violent, brutal, continuing and unauthorized physical interaction" that caused his death.

Crump said the family tried to settle out of court with the Sheriff's Office for its insurance policy of $3.1 million, which Crump described as "grossly inadequate." By refusing to settle, he said the county showed "bad faith." A specific amount for damages was not cited in the lawsuit, which presented only the plaintiff's side of the case.

Bay County Sheriff Frank McKeithen said a settlement was not yet possible.

"It is premature because the investigation is incomplete and still pending at this time," McKeithen said.

The DJJ declined comment on the suit.

"Our thoughts and prayers remain with the family of Martin Lee Anderson," DJJ Secretary Anthony Schembri said. "While unable to comment on the pending lawsuit, the department remains committed to the safety of the youth in its care."

Anderson's family's attorneys cited the case of an 18-year-old Texan, Bryan Alexander, who died two days after being hospitalized for pneumonia when he got sick at a boot camp in January 2001. A jury awarded his family $40.1 million in 2003.

'More than money'

Crump said "it's about so much more than money," but predicted a Florida jury would return a verdict similar to Alexander's case. He called Anderson's death "far more heinous, far more overt and far more worse than Bryan Alexander's."

Anderson's death caused statewide public outcry. The Martin Lee Anderson Act, rushed through the Legislature with bipartisan support, requires closing of the military-style boot camps and authorizes creation of education-oriented training facilities for juveniles.

Contact reporter Daniela Velazquez

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008