COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Judge backs shock treatment

BY JENNIFER SINCO KELLEHER
Newsday Staff Writer

September 9, 2006

 
A federal judge on Friday reinstated electric skin-shock treatments for 45 New York students whose parents are plaintiffs in a lawsuit seeking to allow their children to receive the therapy at a Massachusetts school for extreme behavioral disorders.

Despite the temporary court order, New York's Board of Regents is expected to make permanent the regulations they've proposed to limit what are known as aversive therapies, including skin shock, after the New York Education Department released a scathing review of the Judge Rotenberg Center in Canton, Mass.

The school, which receives about $50 million a year from New York State, has been under intense scrutiny for its unique shock therapy since a Freeport mother announced plans in March to sue her school district for sending her son to Rotenberg.

On Friday night, the school's director, Matthew Israel, said U.S. District Court Judge Gary Sharpe's decision is a victory for the parents who have found the form of therapy effective for their children, despite the state report that criticized the school for strapping students to wooden boards while shocking them. He said the Regents did not give parents much opportunity to voice their support of the school.

"We're very happy the parents finally had a chance to make their decisions heard," Israel said.

However, Long Island Regents representative Roger Tilles said that the federal court ruling "would not prohibit us from making our rule a permanent rule" for those New York students not included in the lawsuit. The board is expected to meet Tuesday in Albany.

Rebecca Cort, deputy commissioner of the state Department of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities, called the decision "extremely limited" and said it has little effect on decisions made regarding aversive therapies. She said it's unclear if the state Education Department will appeal.

The parents and the Rotenberg center filed the lawsuit last month, asking that the treatment not be limited. Israel said since the Regents' rules went into effect on June 23 - including allowing shocks only for aggression or abuse and not combining forms of aversive therapy - 80 percent of the students regressed significantly.

The shocks, which last up to 2 seconds, are meant to curb undesirable behavior, such as attacking others or self-abuse.

Samantha Shear, 13, of Roslyn Heights, is one of the students included in Friday's decision. The autistic girl repeatedly struck herself in the head with such force that she damaged her retinas, her parents said.

Her father, Dr. Mitchell Shear, an internal medicine physician, said the reduction in shock therapy made Samantha whine more and affected her ability to follow directions.

Shear said he's relieved that the judge allowed the injunction but worries about the temporary status.

A trial will determine if the injunction becomes permanent. A pretrial hearing is scheduled for Oct. 19.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008