Oh, what an unfair documentary is
"Jesus Camp." Unfair and riveting and alarming and highly watchable
-- but outrageously unfair. It's the kind of documentary where you
assume the subjects didn't know what the finished product would look
like when they agreed to be filmed. That, or they subscribe to the
philosophy that there's no such thing as bad publicity.
The general topic is evangelical Christians, or what most of us
call fundamentalist Christians. Specifically, the subject is Becky
Fischer, a stout, friendly pastor in Missouri who runs a youth Bible
camp every summer. She and her parishioners are Pentecostals, or
what some call "holy rollers," where the services are marked by
speaking in tongues and by loud singing, praying and weeping.
Directed by Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, the film is concerned
with how powerful evangelical Christians are becoming in this
country. Ted Haggard, a superstar pastor from Colorado, meets with
Pres. Bush every Monday, we're told. Haggard tells the filmmakers
that his people are numerous enough that "if the evangelicals vote,
they determine the election." All he and his fellow ministers have
to do is get the word out on how they ought to vote.
Here's a statistic: 75 percent of home-schooled children are
evangelical Christians. We meet one, a sweet 12-year-old named Levi
who is one of Fischer's kids and who sports a most unfortunate
mullet haircut. Levi's mom teaches him at home; one scene has her
instructing him on how global warming is only a myth. (I have enough
trouble understanding why global warming is a political issue. How
did it become a religious one?) I don't want to get into the
home-schooling thing and how most of the kids who go that route turn
out to be socially retarded freaks, but here's strong evidence that
going to a real school and being exposed to a variety of ideas, and
not just your parents' doctrines, is a GOOD thing.
Levi tells Fischer he was "saved" at the age of 5, when he
decided he wanted more out of life. At 5 years old he was already
dissatisfied with his spiritual welfare? Fischer asks. Yeah, he
says. And he's been happy ever since.
We're allowed to see quite a few of Fischer's religious
gatherings, which always culminate in fervent wailing and praises.
The children, most younger than 12, are just as passionate in their
ululations as th adults are. The images are eerie, unsettling -- and
then you realize the filmmakers have put spooky ambient music on the
soundtrack to enhance the effect. Is that necessary? Wouldn't these
activities have seemed strange enough without the addition of music?
I'm torn on whether stacking the deck this way is good filmmaking
or bad. It certainly helps make the filmmakers' point, but it's
obviously not very evenhanded as a documentary technique. It makes
me less inclined to trust the film. For every scene where someone
says something narrow-minded, eyebrow-raising or bizarre, I wonder
how many scenes were omitted in which the person seemed perfectly
sane.
What strikes me about the kids at Fischer's Bible camp is how
INTENSE they are. They get caught up in the enthusiasm of the prayer
meetings and wind up sobbing with sorrow over their sins, or crying
out in desperate pleas to have a transcendent spiritual experience.
But they're KIDS. What sin could a 9-year-old possibly have
committed that would require so much abject remorse? How deeply
could a 10-year-old truly desire to be "saved"?
It seems to me that much of the behavior is imitative. They've
been taught that this is what Christians do, so when the adults
speak in tongues and mourn loudly while repenting, the kids do the
same thing, whether they have anything to repent of or not. And when
the adults talk about this sinful world and how our leader, George
W. Bush, is such a great Christian and we should support him, the
children echo their sentiments -- even though, let's be honest, the
children have no idea how sinful this world is or whether Bush is a
good Christian or what America needs.
The film is a little scary at times, scary in the way it shows
fundamentalist Christians as zealous automatons, scary in the way
that apparently a lot of fundamentalist Christians ARE zealous
automatons. Radio commentator Mike Papantonio is the film's voice of
reason, a Christian who provides contrast to the evangelicals'
zealotry.
But there's a tinge of sadness, too. Never mind whether the
children are being taught good principles or correct doctrine. I'm a
Christian (one of the boring kinds, without the screaming or
in-tongues-speaking), and I absolutely support the idea of teaching
kids about Jesus and how to live good, Christian lives. The sadness
is in how these kids seem so single-mindedly ardent, not like kids
at all but like tiny grown-ups, saying grown-up things.
Fischer and her fellow youth ministers want to train their young
people to be as dedicated to Christianity as Muslim kids are to
Islam. Look at what's going on in the Middle East, they say. These
kids will strap bombs to themselves and walk into public squares,
all because they believe their God wants them to. We don't want our
kids doing THAT, exactly, but that level of commitment and devotion
is enviable.
Or is it? Where do you draw the line between teaching children
solid values and turning them into too-serious mini-preachers? If
the film is any indication, these kids are missing out on the fun
parts of childhood. They're not being allowed to just be kids. Is
that really what we want?
Agree? Disagree? You can
post your
thoughts about this review on the DVD Talk forums.