Having spent my career assessing troubled children for
possible residential placement (NOT BOOT CAMPS) I can say
unequivocally that boot camps do not work. Such programs, in my
view, have no concept of the fact that so-called "problem
behavior" is always indicative of some sort of emotional
problem. Such problems generally stem from long term
dysfunctional family settings (of course there are other
causative factors but in my experience this was always at or
very near the very top of the list). I don't think that
responsible child welfare agencies or professionals use boot
camps (if they do they are not worth the name of professional).
Boot camps appear largely based on the premise that problem
behavior stems from some sort of moral failure and that the
failure can be remedied by the application of iron discipline.
This is a totally fallacious assumption which ignores the
underlying emotional genesis of behavior "problems."
Troubled teenagers distrust all adults (often with some
justice depending on the nature of the treatment they have
received from the adults in their lives). Generally, it is only
when a troubled kid is treated with honesty and respect by the
adults working with them that they will begin to have a chance
to face their problems and try to make changes. This sort of
work is very hard, it takes a lot more than good intentions on
the part of the helper, you have to find ways to show kids they
matter and count for something no matter what they may have
done. There is no one formula by which this might be done. When
I speak of the importance of honesty in helping kids & their
families face their underlying emotional issues, you would be
mistaken to think that this means giving them a free ride. You
expect them to face their issues, but not alone, rather it is
with the support of adults who are honest and who care. If you
think kids don't know the difference on these issues you are
sadly mistaken.
One of the great problems in treating emotionally troubled
teens is finding a viable modality of treatment for them. In
principle the best choice is a combination of individual &
family therapy. Many parents are very resistant to the notion
they play a role in why their children have problems. It is not
that they are to blame (even though that may be the case
sometimes, especially in situations of child abuse), rather it
is the idea that no child grows up in a vacuum. Even those who
can understand intellectually, often have problems when it comes
to owning up to their own failures/dysfunctions.
The complexity of the issues involved can often be quite
intimidating to all parties involved, which is one reason why
illusory solutions like boot camps can be so attractive.
Unfortunately there is no quick fix, only hard patient work
possibly for years with no certainty it will pay off. But with
the kids I worked with, I found that when I could take the time
and establish a caring, honest supportive relationship with
them, they invariably did at least somewhat better. Of course
our so called social services are generally not committed to an
intensive casework approach for a variety of reasons, all short
sighted and self defeating.
Another reason for the false allure of the boot camp is
because it allows the family to avoid its responsibility/role in
the problems. When parents successfully avoid facing their part
in the problems the child becomes the victimizer (some kids
learn to exploit this, generally much to their sorrow) and the
parents become the victimized. Boot camps and their ilk all too
often consciously/unconsciously punish the child for the role it
often never sought.
Boot camps are by their very nature inherently abusive, the
only thing that varies is the degree of abusiveness. Children
are placed in such facilities due to ignorance, denial, belief
in the idea of a quick fix, but most likely by parents
unconsciously interested in punishing their children for their
failures/dysfunctions. Such facilities help perpetuate the
failure of society toward our troubled children because they
cannot, will not and do not know how to treat the underlying
emotional problems of the young people they are supposed to
serve.
_____
The author, now retired, has had 31 years of experience in
working for the New Jersey Division of Youth & Family Services.
He held the position of Family Service Specialist 1, and worked
mostly with troubled teenagers at risk of out-of-home placement
in residential facilities. See
My 31 years working
with kids and their families, Mr. Lawton's letter to PTAVE
of January 22, 2005.
Copy right is waived. For best reproduction of this page,
use
www.nospank.net/lawton.pdf (If this or
any other PDF page fails to open due to a popup blocker on your
system, hold down the "Ctrl" button and click the link again.)
|