COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 


 

Camp owner moves to halt a lawsuit in teen's death

Brown Schools want an arbitrator to handle the case if parents sue

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Friday, June 20, 2003

The owners of a Hill Country wilderness camp where a teenager died in October have filed a pre-emptive legal strike in an attempt to avoid litigation by the boy's family and to keep the case in Mason County.

The Brown Schools, a Delaware corporation with operations based in Austin, filed a petition in state District Court in Mason County earlier this month, asking a judge to rule that any dispute over the death of 17-year-old Chase Moody at the On Track therapeutic wilderness program be turned over to a binding arbitration panel.

The court filing, which names Chase's mother and father as defendants, says the family agreed to as much in a contract signed by Chase's mother before the teen was enrolled in the camp.

Lawyers for the Brown Schools, which operates youth-oriented therapeutic programs across the country, filed the petition June 6 — the same day they met with the Moodys' lawyers, who include Johnnie Cochran, the high-profile attorney who successfully defended O.J. Simpson.

David McLaughlin, a lawyer in the Cochran Firm who is working on the case, called the Brown Schools' petition premature because the family has not sued.

"We're (still) weighing our options," he said Thursday.

Howard Falkenberg, the Brown Schools' spokesman in Austin, said company officials were aware that the Moodys are considering legal action and filed the petition to make clear their opinion that any dispute with the family should be handled outside the courtroom.

Should a judge disagree, Falkenberg said, the company at least wanted to establish grounds for the case to be considered in Mason County.

"That's where the admissions agreement was signed, and that's where his management was, and that's where his unfortunate death occurred," Falkenberg said. "All those things just seem to argue that that's where the matter should be handled."

Chase, who lived with his mother in Richardson, was sent to the camp to work out anger issues and other behavioral problems. He died there Oct. 14 after being physically restrained by at least three camp staff members because of what the company said was a violent outburst.

According to an autopsy, Chase suffocated on his own vomit, a report disputed by the Brown Schools.

Officials with the company have repeatedly said their staff acted appropriately in handling the situation.

State investigators disagree and have accused the staff members involved of physical abuse in connection with the death. The state also cited the camp for 28 violations of state standards after a licensing investigation of the incident.

The staff members are appealing the findings, as is the Brown Schools, even though the company closed the camp for unrelated reasons shortly after Chase's death. He was the fifth youth to die after being restrained in the company's Texas facilities since 1988.

Alan Rau, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law and an expert in arbitration, said the likelihood of any potential case going to an arbitration panel could come down to technical issues, including how the judge interprets the admissions contract Chase's mother signed.

"There were two things, if I were Johnnie Cochran, I would say. One is that Texas personal injury can't be arbitrated under a pre-dispute clause unless you have the signatures of the lawyers, which you never get," Rau said. "Another argument occurs to me that I would make — if I were Johnnie Cochran — is that the clause doesn't cover this kind of thing."

However, Rau said, there also are questions as to whether federal laws, which can trump state statutes and tend to favor arbitration agreements, apply.

"It's not a slam dunk either way," Rau said. "There are arguments that could be made both ways."

josborne@statesman.com; 445-3621

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008