COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

                                                                              More on Deaths in Youth Facilities                                                                          

March 8, 2006

Boot-Camp Nurse Failed Young Victim

OUR OPINION: SUSPENSION NEEDED UNTIL STATE PROBE IS COMPLETED

Anyone who has ever received the tender ministrations of a nurse in a time of distress knows that nurses are vital to the healing process -- and indispensable to the practice of medicine. Unfortunately, nurse Kristin Anne Schmidt, who watched in silence while guards at the Bay County Boot Camp in Panama City ganged up on a 14-year-old boy, appears to have forgotten that her job is to help save lives.

Nurse stands by

Martin Lee Anderson, the victim, died just a few hours after eight grown men punched and kneed him for allegedly failing to perform an exercise routine. A videotape shows Ms. Schmidt standing by a few feet away while guards pummel the unresisting boy. By the time she fetched a supervisor, it was too late. No one will ever know whether a forceful intervention or sharp rebuke by the nurse -- Stop it now! -- could have saved young Anderson's life, but surely it would have been the proper thing to do.

Some experts in ethical behavior have speculated that Ms. Schmidt was under pressure to accommodate her role to the atmosphere of a disciplinary facility. Perhaps, but no such consideration overrides the duty of nurses to respect and nurture life.

The Code of Ethics of the American Nurses Association makes it clear that compassion should be the guiding ideal of the nursing profession. It further states: ``Acquiescing and accepting unsafe or inappropriate practices, even if the individual does not participate in the specific practice, is equivalent to condoning unsafe practice.''

Sadly, Ms. Schmidt is not the first nurse in recent Florida history whose actions, or failure to act, have been called into question in the wake of a death by a juvenile in state custody. Following the June 2003 death of 17-year-old Omar Paisley at a Miami lockup operated by the Department of Juvenile Justice, nurses Gaile Loperfido and Dianne Demeritte were charged with manslaughter and third-degree murder. The trial is pending.

Ethics violation

That situation was significantly different in many ways, but certainly the performance of the nurses in both instances can be deemed inconsistent with the accepted standards of the nursing profession, to say the least. Until the actions of Ms. Schmidt can be clarified, she should not be allowed to stay on the job as if nothing had happened.

Meanwhile, all nurses who work in state institutions where men and women -- young or otherwise -- are disciplined should be reminded of this relevant admonition in the ANA Code of Ethics: ``Nurses should not remain employed in facilities that routinely violate patient rights or require nurses to severely and repeatedly compromise standards of practice and personal morality'' (emphasis added).

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008