PANAMA CITY, FL -
Bay County's chief medical examiner released a statement late
Thursday evening defending his autopsy results of 14 year-old
Martin Lee Anderson, the boy who died just hours after his
induction into the Bay County Sheriff's Office Boot Camp on
January 5th.Last
month Dr. Charles Siebert, the chief medical examiner for Bay
County, ruled Anderson died a natural death due to complications
from sickle cell trait. Controversy ensued as the boy's family
and other medical experts disputed Siebert's claim.
On Tuesday, the
Hillsborough County state attorney's office said the initial
results of a second autopsy conducted the day before showed
Martin Anderson did not die of natural causes.
Siebert's statement
defending his actions follows a letter sent to special
prosecutor Mark Ober by three state senators earlier on
Thursday, calling for the arrest of the boot camp personnel
involved in the Anderson incident and the arrest of Siebert and
Bay County Sheriff Frank McKeithen.
According to the
Associated Press, Dr. Michael Baden, who observed the second
autopsy for Anderson's family, told Florida lawmakers via phone
on Friday that Anderson likely died because he couldn't breathe
and that he was likely brain dead by the time he arrived at the
hospital. The chairman of the state House Criminal Justice
Appropriations Committee held his head in his hands at Baden's
pronouncement during a morning conference call.
Martin Anderson's
family will hold a news conference on Monday in response to Dr.
Siebert's statement.
STATEMENT BY DR. CHARLES
SIEBERT
BAY COUNTY MEDICAL EXAMINER
March 16, 2006
On January 6th,
2006, I conducted the original autopsy on Martin Lee
Anderson. Based on Mr. Anderson’s medical records, the facts
surrounding his death, and evidence available to me at the
time of the autopsy, I concluded the cause of death to be
hemorrhaging resulting from a complication of sickle cell
trait; and that his manner of death was natural.
While I have
the utmost respect for the pathologists involved in the
second autopsy on Mr. Anderson, I stand behind my findings.
My autopsy revealed that Mr. Anderson had sickle cell trait.
The evidence revealed that on January 5th, 2006, prior to
the incident with the drill instructors, Mr. Anderson, after
doing push-ups and sit-ups, collapsed to the ground while
running laps and complained of having difficulty breathing.
This clearly indicates that Mr. Anderson was having medical
problems prior to his interaction with the drill
instructors. It is well documented in the medical literature
that sudden idiopathic death after exercise is a risk
associated with sickle cell trait.
In my expert
opinion, the bruises found during the autopsy were not of a
significant nature to affect cause of death. In addition,
these types of injuries are not a risk of sickle cell trait,
nor would they have initiated a sickle cell event.
My conclusion,
based on more than a decade of practice, is that the
exertion from exercise triggered Mr. Anderson’s sickle cell
trait which caused Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC),
resulting in hemorrhaging. Complications of sickle cell
trait is the cause of death. Because exertion from exercise
is a natural activity, I concluded the manner of death to be
natural.
On March 13th
2006, I observed the second autopsy conducted by
Hillsborough County Medical Examiner Dr. Vernard Adams. The
results of the 12 hour autopsy have yet to be made public.
It is not unheard of for pathologists and other medical
experts to arrive at differing conclusions after reviewing
the same case. I welcome the opportunity to review the
findings and conclusions of the second autopsy.
As a medical
professional, I am appalled at the baseless and mean
spirited accusations from special interest groups with
little or no knowledge of the evidence in this case who are
calling for everything from the revocation of my license to
criminal charges. I have a responsibility, inherent in my
position, to review facts of a case and issue an expert
unbiased opinion, which I did in Mr. Anderson’s case.