COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Faulty door caused teen's fall down elevator shaft: inquiry

Wed, 03 May 2006 

Click here for more articles re: the death of Kyle Young

FROM JUNE 30, 2005: Testimony wraps up in Alberta inquiry into elevator death

A broken door is to blame for the death of a handcuffed teenager who plunged five storeys down an elevator shaft at an Edmonton courthouse in 2004, an inquiry says.

That's the key finding of the inquiry's report in a case that drew national attention after it was revealed that Kyle Young, a 16-year-old prisoner, was being restrained against the elevator door by two guards.

The head of the inquiry, Judge Jerry LeGrandeur, cleared the guards of any wrongdoing, finding they did not use excessive force as they restrained the prisoner.

His report, made public this week, blames a mechanical problem in the door, which gave way and swung inward like a closet door suddenly popping off its track.
 

Kyle Young, a 16-year-old prisoner, was being restrained against an elevator door when it gave way and let him fall into the shaft.

Young, who was handcuffed and shackled, fell five floors and became suspended by his neck on a structural bracket.

During the inquiry – which wrapped up on June 30, 2005, after hearing from 22 witnesses over 4½ weeks – an elevator expert testified that he believed a pin meant to hold the door in its track was broken before the accident.

He said the amount of force needed to dislodge the door was equivalent to a 150-pound person walking into the door at a fast pace.

"The door was in a damaged condition before the incident occurred," inquiry lawyer David Syme explained.

He said that led to the inquiry's conclusion that the amount of force needed to cause the door to give way was not that excessive.

The inquiry heard that when the tragedy occurred, Young was in the courthouse's prisoner holding-cell area. He was being moved to another floor because he had been disruptive.

The inquiry's report makes a number of recommendations, including that:

•           Young offenders make court appearances by video conference whenever possible.

•           All elevators in provincial courthouses have hoist-door retainers to help ensure that they don't swing open unexpectedly.

•           All elevators in provincial courthouses undergo regularly scheduled maintenance.

•           The province give more detailed rules governing the restraint of prisoners.

"I think everybody wishes that [the faulty door] could have been discovered before this incident," said Annette Bidniak, spokesperson for Alberta's Solicitor General.

"But it's just a horrible tragedy and everyone involved wants to make sure that something like this never happens again."

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008