COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

DESERT HILLS CENTER FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES — EVEN UNDER INVESTIGATION, ABUSES CONTINUE

Desert Hills Center for Youth and Families came under investigation for the February 1998 restraint death of 15-year-old Edith Campos. Medical examiners confirmed that Edith had died of asphyxiation after being restrained. Senator Elaine Richardson (D-Tucson), has now called for the treatment facility to be shut down following recent allegations that two teenage girls were sexually molested by an employee who was supervising them.

“While they (Desert Hills) are still being monitored and investigated, these allegations are still happening,” Richardson said. “If they are happening while they are being monitored, what’s happening when we don’t have their feet to the fire?”

“These children are placed in the facility for rehabilitation, learning, treatment and to become prepared to enter society from [sic: a] safe environment,” Richardson wrote. “Instead, they have been exposed to violence, illegal conduct, serious mistreatment and even death. I feel there is no alternative at this time other than to close this facility and cause no more harm to these troubled children.”7

IS THERE A MONETARY INCENTIVE BEHIND THE USE OF RESTRAINTS?

Kenneth Clark, M.D., a Harvard College graduate and psychiatrist, stated that patients were placed in restraints because this then justified their placement in a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit, which gives a higher rate of reimbursement.

“Regarding reimbursement rates for patients placed in restraints — know that if they say a patient is uncontrollable the patient is then transferred to the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The daily rate is higher, so there is a rate increase when the patient is in restraints as the patient obviously needs more intensive care. I know there were instances where the patient was aggravated or provoked to justify the use of restraints and this placement.

“The staff at the hospital where I worked referred to the practice as ‘Mayhem Therapy.’ I don’t have exact figures but I do know that it cost more than a thousand dollars a day for a patient for this. This estimate is probably on the low side.”1

One psychiatric facility lists their rates for various programs and services. Intensive Care for both adults and adolescent patients costs more than standard services:

Inpatient Hospitalization Programs

*Adult Standard — $550.00 per day

*Adolescent Standard — $575.00 per day

*Intensive Care (Adult & Adolescent) — $650.00 per day.2

Psychiatric Intensive Care Units do include the use of restraints and seclusion in their treatment of patients as noted in the information in the promotional materials of one psychiatric hospital that provides this service.3

Psychiatric hospitals are not the only facilities that get a higher reimbursement rate for patients who are labeled as being more agitated and/or a problem. In an excerpt from an interview with a former residential treatment facility employee from Texas, the claims of Dr. Clark were echoed:

“You keep up the incident reports because the insurance company wants to know the progress. You have a ‘Catch-22’ in that the insurance won’t keep the client there if there isn’t some progress, so you have to show some progress, and then if you have a lot of agitation, then you can say that because he has become more difficult, his care has gone from $5,000 to $9,000 per month. That was done.”4

A news article that ran in the Charlotte Observer April 5, 1999, discussed the fact that state officials were once again questioning the effectiveness of treatment at an upstate psychiatric facility where they had twice previously removed children after incidents of little care, given drugs they did not need and, in one instance, the sexual assault of a 14-year-old. How much does all of this cost the state?

The state pays $252 per day to the facility for each child covered by Medicaid. From July 1 to March 1, the state paid a total of $642,424, compared with $216,493 during the previous 12 months, according to the state Department of Health and Human Services.5

In March of this year, 9-year-old Timithy Thomas became the latest child to die of asphyxiation after being physically restrained. The facility where Timithy Thomas was placed charges $172.00 per child per day — which comes to over $5,100 per month.6

1 Statement from psychiatrist Kenneth Clark, 6 April 1999. On file with CCHR International.

2 Schedule of Rates effective July 1, 1996 through June 30, 1997, “Program Fees” for Chestnut Lodge Hospital. Internet website address http://www.chestnutlodge.com/Rates.htm (accessed 6 April, 1999).

3 Acute Assessment and Treatment Program and the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit. Internet website address http://www.bcmhs.bc.ca/aatp.htm

4 Excerpt from CCHR Texas interview done on 2/12/98. On file with CCHR International and CCHR Texas office.

5 The Charlotte Observer, “Therapy questioned at kids’ hospital” April 5, 1999.

6 The Charlotte Observer, “Report: Boy’s death caused by asphyxiation,” Saturday, March 13, 1999 and Grandfather Home for Children, Inc. “Answers to Frequently Asked Questions” from their internet website at http://www.grandfatherhome.org/faq.htm

7 The Arizona Daily Star, “Sen. Richardson wants Desert Hills shut down,” Tuesday, 6 April 1999.

 http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm/10657

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008