COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANΗAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Omar Paisley

Final Report of the Miami-Dade County Grand Jury

http://www.miamisao.com/publications/grand_jury/2000s/gj2003s.pdf


 

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE

FINAL REPORT

OF THE

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY GRAND JURY

SPRING TERM A.D. 2003

*******

State Attorney

KATHERINE FERNANDEZ RUNDLE

Chief Assistant State Attorney

DON L. HORN

Assistant State Attorney

BRONWYN C. MILLER

CONCEPCION PORTELA SHIRLEY BOYER

FOREPERSON CLERK

FILED

January 27, 2004

Circuit Judge Presiding

JUDITH L. KREEGER

Officers and Members of the Grand Jury

CONCEPCION PORTELA

Foreperson

DANIEL CALIXTE

Vice Foreperson

DONNIE K. JOHNSON

Treasurer

SHIRLEY BOYER

Clerk

JAIRO ABREU JOSE L. MARCOS

LANA M. ANGEL DOROTHY MILLER

JOSE BELETTE DARQUITA ROBINSON

JULIAN BOWEN JUAN F. RODRIGUEZ

HUMBERTO DURAN GLORIA M. SARDUY

LUIS C. GUIA SANDRA M. SEGURA

MILDRED M. KAVALIR ROYCE E. SMITH

LIBBY KLEIN MARTIN SUAREZ

FELIX M. LORENZO

* * * * * * *

Clerk of the Circuit Court

HARVEY RUVIN

* * * * * * *

Administrative Assistant

ROSE ANNE DARE

* * * * * * *

Bailiff

NELIDO GIL, JR.

I N D E X

INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEATH OF OMAR PAISLEY

AND THE DEPARTMENTOF JUVENILE JUSTICE MIAMI-DADE REGIONAL

JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER

Pages 1 - 50

I. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………..…………………... 1

II. BACKGROUND REGARDING THE DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE

JUSTICE AND THE MDRJDC …………………………………….…….…..…….…. 2

III. BACKGROUND REGARDING OMAR PAISLEY ……………………..…………... 5

IV. ISSUES REGARDING EMERGENCY PROCEDURES IN THE

MIAMI-DADE REGIONAL JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER ……….……....... 12

V. OVERCROWDING IN THE FACILITY …………………….…………...…..…...…. 15

A. MODULE STAFFING ISSUES IN THE FACILITY ……….……….…….... 17

B. CENTRAL CONTROL STAFFING IN THE FACILITY ……………..……. 18

VI. LACK OF A FUNCTIONING SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM IN

THE FACILITY …………………………………..……………………..…..……....….. 19

VII. PROVISION OF MEDICAL CARE IN THE FACILITY …………..……..…...….... 21

A. MEDICAL REQUEST FORM RESPONSE TIME ………………..………... 21

B. LACK OF FACILITY OPERATING PROCEDURES

GOVERNING HEALTH CARE REQUESTS ……………………….…..….. 23

C. ISSUES RELATING TO MEDICAL STAFF IN THE FACILITY ……….… 23

1. Lack of a Health Services In-House Delivery System …………….…..… 23

2. Failure By Medical Staff to Respond to Requests for

Assistance and Failure by Medical Staff to Coordinate

Emergency Efforts ………………….……………………….………..….. 25

3. Failure by Nursing Staff to Contact a Physician and Failure

by Medical Staff to Follow Standing Orders ………………….…….…… 26

4. Failure by Medical Staff to Document Medical Records in a

Comprehensive & Timely Manner …………………………….…..…….. 27

5. Assigning an Officer Permanently to the Medical Station /

Requiring That All Patients be Examined in the Medical

Station of the Facility …………………………………………...……….. 30

6. Lack of Availability of 24-Hour On-Site Medical Care

in the Facility …………………………………………………………...... 30

VIII. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF

JUVENILE JUSTICE AND THE OFFICE OF THE

INSPECTOR GENERAL …………………………………………..……….…. 31

IX. ISSUES RELATING TO STAFFING AND SUPERVISION ……..……………..... 32

A. Failure to Conduct Preliminary National Background Screenings

On Privately Contracted Providers ………………………….………….….… 32

B. Issues Regarding Department of Juvenile Justice Employees

With Criminal Backgrounds and Pending Criminal Cases ………………….. 34

C. Non-Compliance With Quality Assurance Standards in the

Facility …………………………….…………………………….……..…….. 36

D. Issues Regarding Lack of Communication Between Administration

And Staff in the Facility …………………………………...………...………. 39

E. Staff Failure to Comply With OSHA Requirements and Facility

Operating Procedures Regarding Disposal of Biohazardous Waste

In the Facility ………………………………………………………..……….. 41

F. Staff Failure to Comply with Facility Operating Procedures

Governing Infectious Disease ………………………………………….…..... 42

X. CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………..…………...… 43

XI. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………..... 44

INDICTMENTS …………………………………….………………………………….……..... 48 - 49

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………….……………………………..…………….. 50

1

INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEATH OF OMAR PAISLEY AND THE

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE MIAMI-DADE REGIONAL JUVENILE

DETENTION CENTER

I. INTRODUCTION

Seventeen-year old Omar Paisley spent the last three days of his life, which ended

June 9, 2003, in agony, lying on a concrete bed in Room 13 of Module Three in the

Department of Juvenile Justice Miami-Dade Regional Juvenile Detention Center

(hereinafter “MDRJDC”). Despite his repeated requests for help, Omar was denied that

which many of us take for granted, appropriate and timely medical care.

As grand jurors, we came from different backgrounds, perspectives, and beliefs.

However, in the course of our service, we discovered that we were united in our outrage

over the death of Omar Paisley. All of us shared common values in our belief that

juvenile detainees are entitled to live in safe, habitable, clean and secure surroundings.

As parents, we knew that we were required to provide our children with medical attention

or face the consequences. We felt strongly that when a facility assumes care for the

children of our community, the facility should be held to this same standard.

We were sensitive to the implementation of severe budgetary cuts in our State

following September 11, 2001. However, each of us arrived independently at the same

conclusion: one can never measure the cost of human life in taxpayer money.

Over the past nine months, we listened closely and critically to testimony from

various people involved in the investigation into the death of Omar Paisley, we labored

over a multitude of statewide reports, we studied statistics and budgets, we toured both

the MDRJDC and the Broward Regional Juvenile Detention Center and we asked

questions at every step along the way. We were, above all, determined to make

recommendations, which, if implemented, would prevent another unnecessary death in

the MDRJDC.

We were appalled at the utter lack of humanity demonstrated by many of the

detention workers charged with the safety and care of our youth. Our mission,

constrained by our legally set time limit, included ascertaining the underlying causes that

2

led to this tragically preventable death in order to demand reforms, and if appropriate,

concurrently identifying criminal acts that may have been committed, either by

individuals or the facility administration or both. At every turn in our investigation, we

were confronted with incompetence, ambivalence and negligence on the part of the

administration and the staff of the MDRJDC as well as the nurses employed by Miami

Children’s Hospital. We discovered in the course of our investigation that numerous

individuals played roles in the death of Omar Paisley. However, in determining which

individuals should be charged with crimes, we are compelled to isolate only the most

egregious conduct. In our estimation, the conduct of two of the nurses was so outrageous

as to rise to the level of criminal negligence and we have felt compelled to issue

indictments for these acts.

In the process, we became frustrated by the numerous legal and factual obstacles

we were confronted with, especially with regard to pursuing criminal charges against the

State, its facility and its direct employees.

The issues we confronted in this case were unique. We do not intend that our

decision to issue indictments in this instance will open the floodgates to consideration of

criminal charges in other cases that are purely civil in nature, i.e. medical malpractice.

We are hopeful that the present state of the law regarding public entities, including

administrative rules concerning government employees, does not diminish in any way the

significance of our findings. Our findings clearly expose a lack of supervision, a lack of

resources, and above all, a lack of benevolence in the MDRJDC.

Following are the conclusions we have thus far reached and the recommendations

we most respectfully request be implemented. 1

II. BACKGROUND REGARDING THE DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE

JUSTICE AND THE MDRJDC

In 1994, the Juvenile Justice Reform Act created a new state agency designed to

oversee juvenile justice issues, the Department of Juvenile Justice.2 The Secretary of the

1 We recognize that, as in all cases, the facts and the evidence essential to the truth of a case surface as the

case unfolds in the system over time. The law does not permit us to sit as a grand jury beyond nine months.

We know this case will remain visible in the system for years to come. Those reforms that can occur today,

must; however, those needs that become self-evident over time must also be addressed in the future.

3

Department of Juvenile Justice was charged with planning for and managing all programs

and services in the juvenile justice system, including detention care.3 In addition to

creating the Department of Juvenile Justice, the Florida Legislature established the

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice Quality Assurance System.4 The purpose of the

Quality Assurance System was to establish minimum thresholds for each component of

programs operated by the Department of Juvenile Justice.5

In the State of Florida, there are a total of 25 juvenile detention centers with a

total of 2,042 beds.6 These centers serve three primary purposes: to detain and monitor

juveniles prior to adjudicatory hearings; to maintain custody of all adjudicated juveniles

awaiting placement in a commitment program; and to impose sanctions for mandatory

sentences implemented pursuant to state law.7 The MDRJDC is, by far, the largest in the

State. The funded operating capacity of the center is 226 beds on any given day.8

Between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2002, 6,808 juveniles were booked into this

facility, often exceeding the funded operating capacity.9

The facility is spread out over a large area of land and is comprised of fourteen

modules intended to house the detainee population, a public school facility, a cafeteria, a

medical center, a gymnasium and administrative areas. As with every juvenile detention

facility in the State of Florida, the MDRJDC has a statutory duty to provide each juvenile

detainee with food, clothing, shelter, education, and medical care. Historically, the

Miami-Dade County Public Schools have provided education for the detainees and the

facility has chosen to outsource medical care.10

In 2001, the MDRJDC entered into a contract with Jackson Memorial Hospital for

the provision of medical services for all detainees. This contract was not renewed in

2002. Instead, on July 1, 2002, the facility opted to enter into a contract with Miami

2 Florida Corrections Commission, 2001 Annual Report at 5.

3 Id.

4 Florida Department of Juvenile Justice, Introduction to Quality Assurance revised March 24, 2003, 2.

5 Id.

6 www.djj.state.fl.us/detention/index.html at 1.

7 Department of Juvenile Justice, 2003 Outcome Evaluation Report at 29.

8 Department of Juvenile Justice, Response to Subpoena Duces Tecum dated October 27, 2003.

9 Id.

10 Outsourcing refers to a process by which a State agency enters into a contract with a private entity to

provide services required by statute.

4

Children’s Hospital (hereinafter “MCH”). The Medical Services contract provided that

the services of five MCH employees (two licensed practical nurses, one registered nurse,

one physician and one file clerk) would be used to fulfill the medical needs of the

detainees at the MDRJDC. The contract specified both hours and shifts: the registered

nurse was to work forty hours per week (from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Monday through

Friday); each licensed practical nurse was to work forty hours per week (with one

working from 1:30 p.m. until 10:00 p.m. Sunday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and

Saturday and the other working from 9:30 a.m. until 6:00 p.m. on Sunday, from 1:30 p.m.

until 10:00 p.m., Monday and Tuesday and from 7:00 a.m. until 3:30 p.m. Friday and

Saturday); the physician was to work nine hours per week; the file clerk was to work

forty hours per week (from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday).

During the same month that MCH entered into the contract to provide medical

services with the MDRJDC, the State of Florida Bureau of Quality Assurance conducted

its 2002 annual inspection.11 Findings issued in the 2002 Bureau of Quality Assurance

Report indicated that the MDRJDC was non-compliant with statewide facility standards

and rated its overall program performance as minimal.12 Specifically, the report found

that the facility was non-compliant with required substance abuse assessment and

evaluation for detainees, screening for health-related conditions, appropriate inventories

of controlled substances, implementation of a required system for control of infectious,

communicable diseases, and implementation of a required system for the provision of

sick call care.13

As reported, surveyed detainees indicated that they did not see the doctor or

dentist in a “timely manner.”14 The inspection also revealed a persistent failure to obtain

consent from parents prior to administering mind-altering medications to the detainees

and failure to educate staff as to the side effects of those medications. Detainees

complained of not being provided with clean towels, clean underwear or clean clothing as

required pursuant to departmental policy.

11 The report itself was issued in September, 2002.

12 The contract between MCH and the Department of Juvenile Justice began on July 1, 2002.

13 See Department of Juvenile Justice, Bureau of Quality Assurance Report (2002).

14 Id. at 7.15 (page 21). It should be noted that a “timely manner” was not defined in the body of the report.

5

III. BACKGROUND REGARDING OMAR PAISLEY

Over eight months after the release of the abysmal 2002 Bureau of Quality

Assurance Report, seventeen-year old Omar Paisley was arrested by the Miami-Dade

Police Department on charges of aggravated battery. Omar was evaluated pursuant to a

Department of Juvenile Justice Detention Risk Assessment form to determine whether or

not he should be detained in the MDRJDC pending the resolution of his case. A

Department of Juvenile Justice Risk Assessment Tool recommended commitment in

secure detention and the presiding judge ordered Omar Paisley detained in the

Department of Juvenile Justice MDRJDC.

On March 26, 2003, the State subsequently filed an announcement of its intent to

review the case for direct file pursuant to section 985.21(4)(d)5, Florida Statutes (2003).

Following this filing, Omar’s defense counsel contacted the State in an effort to convince

the State to retain the case in the juvenile system. Omar Paisley wrote a letter to the State

Attorney’s Office stating: “I am sorry for what I have done. I made a stupid mistake. I

was wrong. I should not have had a fight with that man.” On June 6, 2003, Omar Paisley

entered into a written plea agreement wherein he admitted to committing the offense of

aggravated battery and agreed to enter into Bay Point Schools, a “moderate risk”

residential program, where he would also receive individual counseling. Omar was to

remain in secure detention at the MDRJDC pending his placement in the residential

program.15

Day One: Saturday

On Saturday morning, June 7, 2003, less than twenty-four hours after he entered

into his plea, Omar Paisley began to complain of illness to both staff members and his

fellow detainees. Omar filled out a “Youth Request for Sick Call” form. These forms

were in use in the facility for detainees to communicate medical complaints to the

Department of Juvenile Justice staff members.16 Once the form is submitted to a

Department of Juvenile Justice Staff member, notification of the “Request” is sent to the

Medical Station. Omar wrote on his form: “My stomach hurts really bad. I don’t know

15 The Plea Agreement was filed on June 6, 2003. The plea agreement specified that a psychiatric

examination was a prerequisite for program placement.

6

what to do. I cand (sic) sleep.” He signed the bottom of the form and gave it to a

Juvenile Detention Officer (hereinafter “JDO”). Logbook entries reveal that the Medical

Station was notified at 12:10 p.m.17 Omar refused to eat lunch on Saturday.

At approximately 2:15 p.m., according to an entry in the Module Three logbook, a

Licensed Practical Nurse (hereinafter “LPN”) by the name of Gaile Loperfido saw

Omar.18 This is the first contemporaneously documented visit of LPN Loperfido.19 LPN

Loperfido filed an addendum to Omar Paisley’s medical records the day after he died.

Her addendum indicates that she first saw Omar at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday morning.

However, we found no evidence to corroborate the 9 o’clock morning visit.20 LPN

Loperfido’s addendum also indicates that she conducted a physical examination of Omar

on Saturday. Detention staff members contend that they never saw LPN Loperfido

conduct a physical examination of Omar that day.21 In fact, these staff members did not

observe LPN Loperfido carrying any equipment with which to conduct a physical

examination, i.e. a blood pressure cuff or a thermometer.22

After seeing Omar at approximately 2:15 p.m., LPN Loperfido filled out a

twenty-four hour medical alert form, specifying that Omar’s medical alert would end on

Sunday, June 8, 2003. She placed Omar on a twenty-four hour liquid diet and ordered

him on bed rest.23 LPN Loperfido’s addendum further indicates that she saw Omar at

7:00 p.m. on Saturday. However, this visit is not corroborated by logbook entries, nor is

it consistent with the testimony of the Department of Juvenile Justice staff.24

16Miami Children’s Hospital, Sick Call and Injury Response Procedures.

17 A logbook is maintained in each of the modules at the facility and is used to record all entries into the

module and any action taken as to any detainee. According to a June 7, 2003 entry in the Module Three

logbook: “Detainee Paisley, Omar complaining about being sick. He refused to eat lunch. Nurses station

notified.” (12:10 p.m.)

18 It should be noted that LPN Loperfido has twenty-five years experience as a medical professional.

19 Her addendum further sets forth that she first saw Omar at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday morning and documents

a series of visits over Saturday and Sunday, totaling 5 visits. The logbooks do not reveal prior documented

visits.

20 See Sworn Statements of JDO Keith North and JDO Nesby Rodriguez.

21 Id.

22 Id.

23 The twenty-four hour liquid diet was in direct contravention with the Miami Children’s Hospital Sick

Call and Emergency Response Procedures. These procedures reflect the following for “Abdominal

Discomfort:” (i) give nothing by mouth; (ii) consult with on-call medical provider; (iii) refer to E.R. if

acute abdomen is suspected.

24 See Sworn Statements of JDO Johnny Byrd and JDO Kavin Walton.

7

At 3:45 p.m. on the same day, Dr. Lloyd Miller arrived to perform Omar’s

psychiatric examination pursuant to the plea agreement. Dr. Miller noted that Omar was

an average sized young man who was under the sheets of his bed suffering from

gastroenteritis. He discovered that Omar was on bed rest which is why Dr. Miller made a

house call “to the bedside of this young man who appeared not to be in one hundred

percent perfect health.”25 He further observed that Omar “was sick with a stomach virus

and his physical condition may have affected his mental outlook during the interview.”26

The MCH physician did not work on Saturday, June 7, 2003, and he was not contacted by

LPN Loperfido regarding Omar’s condition on that day.

On Friday, the day before these events transpired in Module Three, another

detainee was complaining of similar symptoms in Module Seven. He submitted a Youth

Request for Sick Call Form and the Medical Station was notified. According to the

medical records of that detainee and the June 6, 2003 logbook entries, that detainee was

seen by LPN Dianne Demeritte. After meeting with that detainee, LPN Demeritte

referred the detainee to the physician. The detainee was indeed physically examined by

the physician and later transferred to the emergency room.27

Day Two: Sunday

On Sunday, June 8, 2003, witnesses reported that Omar continued to complain of

abdominal pain, and continued to have vomiting and diarrhea.28 LPN Loperfido saw

Omar at approximately 9:00 a.m. on Sunday.29 LPN Loperfido continued to order a

liquid diet and bed rest, as she had the preceding day. As LPNs are traditionally charged

with patient assessment, a major issue in this case is whether or not LPN Loperfido

conducted a physical examination of Omar during the Sunday morning visit.30 Detention

25 Dr. Miller received information from the detention staff on duty and Omar regarding Omar’s condition.

26 Id.

27 See Medical Records of D.H. (it should be noted that juvenile detainees are referred to by initials only).

28 See Sworn Statement of JDO Michael Johnson at page 25 (Omar told LPN Loperfido his stomach was

“so sore”).

29 The Logbook reflects a 9:05 a.m. visit by LPN Loperfido. “Nurse on mod to see Paisley, Omar. Youth

has a virus and complaining of serious abdominal pain. Staff advised to give plenty of liquid and not to

allow youth to leave room.” Again, LPN Loperfido’s addendum to Omar’s medical records indicates that

she first saw Omar at 9:00 a.m. on Saturday morning and documents a series of five visits over Saturday

and Sunday. We do not have any evidence to corroborate these five visits.

30 It should be noted that a medical diagnosis (as opposed to a nursing diagnosis) is typically done by a

physician.

8

staff contend that they did not observe her perform a physical examination.31 Per her

addendum, LPN Loperfido states that she again saw Omar on Sunday night at

approximately 8:00 p.m. However, detention staff members contend that she went to

Module Three to see another detainee, A.W., but did not see Omar.32 The MCH

physician was not working on Sunday, June 8, 2003, and LPN Loperfido did not contact

him regarding Omar’s condition on that day.

Day Three: Monday

According to sworn statements of JDOs and an entry in the Module Three

Logbook, on Monday, June 9, 2003, Omar woke up at 5:30 a.m. urgently requesting

medical care. The on-duty JDO observed: “Paisley is not looking real well.”33 Per JDOs

Burney and Morgan, this message was conveyed to the Department of Juvenile Justice

LPN at breakfast. However, there was no apparent follow-up.34

By most accounts, Omar spent Monday in excruciating pain.35 He was unable to

get out of the bed and continued vomiting and excreting on himself.36 Payroll records

indicate that at least four of the five contracted MCH medical personnel were working in

some capacity at the facility on that day. However, by all accounts, it appears that only

LPN Dianne Demeritte saw Omar on Monday.37

At approximately 1:32 p.m., Indigo38 JDO Alfreda Mitchell picked up detainee

K.R. on Module Three. Upon arrival on Module Three, Officer Mitchell was informed of

Omar’s chronic illness by a JDO. Officer Mitchell returned to the Medical Station with

K.R. and believes she informed LPN Demeritte at that time of Omar’s worsening

condition.39

31 See Sworn Statements of JDO Shana Jerry and JDO Michael Johnson.

32 See Sworn Statements of JDO Johnny Byrd and JDO Kavin Walton.

33 Entry in Module Three Logbook at 9:05 a.m.

34 The Department of Juvenile Justice LPN was in a training during the day on June 9, 2003.

35 See Sworn Statement of JDO Johnny Byrd at 21; Sworn Statement of JDO Michael Johnson at 30.

36 See Sworn Statement of A.W. at 22; See Sworn Statement of Terry Mixon.

37 Detainee S.S. stated that LPN Demeritte saw Omar once before dinner and once after dinner. LPN

Demeritte indicated to the Department of Juvenile Justice LPN that she had seen Omar twice on the date of

his death. See Sworn Statement of LPN Jeffrey Coachman to Office of the Inspector General at 20.

38 An “Indigo” JDO is an officer who is assigned to escort medical personnel throughout the facility.

39 See Sworn Statement of Alfreda Mitchell to the Office of the Inspector General at 7.

9

Detention Officer Terry Mixon was alone on Module Three with over twenty

detainees for much of the afternoon and early evening hours of June 9, 2003.40 At dinner,

between 5:30 p.m. and 5:50 p.m., Officer Mixon saw LPN Demeritte in person and asked

her to check on Omar.41 Officer Mixon appeared worried and told LPN Demeritte that

Omar was “real sick,” already on a liquid diet and could not keep anything in his

stomach.42 He told LPN Demeritte that someone needed to look at Omar.43 Sworn

statements reveal that during the early evening hours, Officer Mixon contacted Indigo

Officer Talmecia Minnis two times over the radio in an effort to summon LPN

Demeritte.44 Officer Minnis conveyed these requests to LPN Demeritte.45

Immediately after dinner, and upon Mixon’s return to Module Three, numerous

officers heard Officer Mixon frantically requesting assistance over the radio from a nurse

or a supervisor.46 These calls continued for an hour and a half, but there was no

immediate response.47 Although Officer Mixon could see Omar’s worsening condition,

he could not leave the module to get assistance nor could he call 911 to summon help for

Omar. As to the former, he was the only JDO in the module and he could not leave more

than twenty detainees unattended. As to the latter, the design of the telephone system

within the facility prevents anyone from being able to make 911 emergency phone calls

from inside the modules. Further, to do so without first contacting a supervisor or

making the request through Central Control48 with approval of a supervisor could

constitute a violation of procedure and could subject Officer Mixon to disciplinary action.

Officer Mixon made radio contact with LPN Demeritte via Indigo JDO Minnis

sometime prior to 7:00 p.m.49 According to Officer Mixon, LPN Demeritte asked what

40 Entry in Module Three Logbook at 181.

41 Id. at 8.

42 Id. at 6.

43 Id.

44 Sworn Statement of Talmecia Minnis to Office of the Inspector General at 8.

45 Id. at 9.

46 See Sworn Statement of JDO Johnny Byrd at 21.

47 Id.

48 Central Control is located directly inside the front entrance of the facility. All incoming and outgoing

telephone calls, visitors, employees, mail, and deliveries are directed through Central Control.

49 See Sworn Statement of JDO Terry Mixon at 9. See Sworn Statement of Indigo JDO Talmecia Minnis to

Office of the Inspector General at 8.

10

was wrong with Omar and indicated she was busy with other things.50 Officer Minnis

recalled that LPN Demeritte indicated several times via radio she would respond to

Module Three, but did not respond.51 A witness indicates that LPN Demeritte was not in

a particular hurry that night; rather, she had time to carry on conversations with staff and

sit down on the various modules for a period of time.52 LPN Demeritte indicated during

the course of one conversation with Officer Mixon that she did not wish to examine

Omar due to the fact that she had a sick child at home.53

Sometime after 8:00 p.m., LPN Demeritte finally made her way to Module Three

to look at Omar. Per Officer Mixon and the detainees housed in Module Three, despite

the fact that Omar could barely move, LPN Demeritte ordered Omar out of his cell.54

Omar dragged himself out of his cell, clinging to a chair outside the door for support.55

LPN Demeritte stated that she had a child at home and did not wish to contaminate her

child with Omar’s virus.56

Cellular telephone records reflect that at 8:08 p.m., LPN Demeritte contacted her

supervisor, Registered Nurse (hereinafter “RN”) Stacy Linfors.57 According to detainees,

LPN Demeritte was laughing on the telephone during the less than two-minute

conversation. At 8:30 p.m., LPN Demeritte completed the paperwork authorizing Omar

to be transferred to Jackson Memorial Hospital for emergency treatment. On the transfer

paperwork, LPN Demeritte indicated that Omar had a 98.5 temperature and a normal

pulse. LPN Demeritte handed the transfer paperwork to Central Control, told the Central

Control JDO that Omar had a normal temperature but was delusional, and then left the

facility without coordinating rescue efforts.58

50 Id.

51 Id.

52 Id. at 33.

53 See Supplemental Sworn Statement of JDO Terry Mixon.

54 Id.

55 Id.

56 Id.

57 The duration of the telephone call was 118 seconds. Based on the information we received, this was the

first contact anyone made with the RN regarding Omar. There is no evidence that has been presented to us

that indicates that the MCH physician was ever notified of Omar’s condition before Omar’s death.

58 This failure to coordinate emergency efforts is discussed at length later in this report.

11

As she was leaving the facility, LPN Demeritte was contacted by JDO Aileru

regarding an ill detainee, I.E., on Module Eight. LPN Demeritte was told that I.E. was

vomiting, had diarrhea, and needed to be seen by medical personnel. LPN Demeritte

stated that the detainee should fill out a Medical Request for Sick Call form and

proceeded to leave the facility.59 Her decision to leave was in direct contravention of the

Miami Children’s Hospital/Department of Juvenile Justice Contract for Medical

Services.60

After LPN Demeritte prepared the paperwork authorizing Omar’s transfer for

emergency treatment, detention staff initially made efforts to transport Omar to Jackson

Memorial Hospital with the MDRJDC van and equipment. However, Facility Operating

Procedures required Omar to be placed in leg and arm restraints (even though in this

instance the detainee could barely walk). Because Omar was unmoving and catatonic by

the time rescue efforts were initiated, lengthy discussion was had regarding the best

means for transport. Omar continued to sit in the chair outside of his cell on Module

Three. As he remained in the chair, brown fluid flowed from his nose and mouth.

Eddie Williams, a volunteer for the Christian Counseling Program, visited the

facility that evening to counsel several of the juvenile detainees. Mr. Williams proceeded

to Module Three at approximately 9:00 p.m. He described what he saw when he arrived

as: “fear, panic, grief, [and] anger.”61 Mr. Williams observed Omar slumped over in the

chair outside of Room 13. He immediately checked and noted that Omar had no pulse.

Despite the fact that each detention worker was trained in First Aid and Cardiopulmonary

Resuscitation, not one of them engaged in efforts to save Omar’s life. LPN Demeritte

was nowhere to be found at this time.

59 See Sworn Statement of JDO Ayodele Aileru at 5.

60 The Miami Children’s Hospital/Department of Juvenile Justice contract specifies that licensed practical

nurses “shall provide the following services: coordinate any emergency medical or dental care approved by

the facility superintendent or designee.” It further specifies: “nursing services shall provide consultation

and response to medical crises, by either on-site presence or coordination of care throughout local

emergency care facilities.” (emphasis added).

61 Sworn Statement of Reverend Eddie Williams at 4.

12

At 9:01 p.m., approximately forty-five minutes after LPN Demeritte’s

conversation with RN Linfors, a call was finally placed to 911.62 At 9:12 p.m., almost an

hour after LPN Demeritte ordered emergency transport and left the facility, paramedics

arrived on Module Three and found Omar unresponsive. Omar was transported to

Jackson Memorial Hospital, where he was declared dead on arrival at 9:43 p.m.

Sometime that evening, JDO Terry Mixon was instructed by his supervisor to

make delayed entries in the Module Three logbook detailing LPN Demeritte’s interaction

with Omar Paisley. He made an entry in the logbook documenting LPN Demeritte’s

appearance on Module Three.

The MCH physician was contacted for the first time regarding Omar Paisley

between 10:30 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Monday, June 9, 2003.

On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, LPN Loperfido submitted a detailed “Addendum to

Medical Records,” documenting her treatment of Omar Paisley on Sunday, June 8, 2003.

That same day, LPN Demeritte told the Department of Juvenile Justice LPN that she did

not want to go in Omar’s room the preceding day because she didn’t want to catch his

virus and take it home.63 She further indicated that she had seen Omar twice the

preceding day.64 She indicated that during her second visit to Module Three, Omar had

been delusional.65

IV. ISSUES REGARDING EMERGENCY PROCEDURES IN THE MIAMIDADE

REGIONAL JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER

When we first immersed ourselves into the facts surrounding the death of Omar

Paisley, each of us listened to the recording of the call placed by Department of Juvenile

Justice staff to 911 on the evening of June 9, 2003, with feelings of anger, sorrow, and

confusion. Over forty-five minutes elapsed between the time LPN Demeritte issued

orders for Omar to be transported to the hospital and the time a call was placed to 911.

62 We were unable to determine why such a long period of time passed before a call was made to 911. It

should be noted that Central Control initially contacted 911 at 9:01 p.m., but the call was disconnected

prior to any conversation. Several seconds later, a second call was placed. In the communications with the

911 operator, the caller indicated that: “the nurse has left the compound.”

63 See Sworn Statement of LPN Jeffrey Coachman to Office of the Inspector General at 17.

64 Id.

65 Id.

13

We listened as a caller told a 911 operator that Omar had a normal pulse and normal

breathing pattern at 9:06 p.m., consistent with the paperwork filled out by LPN

Demeritte. We knew, based on testimony, that by this time, Omar had no pulse, was not

breathing, and had brown fluid seeping from his nose and mouth.

Armed with this information, we carefully watched the first round of Legislative

Hearings pertaining to the death of Omar Paisley. In the course of these hearings, we

scrutinized the testimony of Larry Lumpee, Assistant Secretary of the Department of

Juvenile Justice. Mr. Lumpee stated that each detention officer was capable of dialing

911 directly from any given facility in the event of an emergency. The Facility Operating

Procedures in place in the MDRJDC indicate to the contrary.66

We were further dismayed when we toured the MDRJDC and visited the

modules. We discovered that when we attempted to dial 911 ourselves, the telephones

located in each module did not permit direct access to 911. Instead, workers are required

to contact a shift supervisor and then 911 calls are approved and routed through Central

Control. We further learned that secure detention workers are not permitted to utilize

personal cellular telephones in the facility.

Finally, we heard compelling testimony regarding the fear of detention workers to

defy their chain of command and to reach out to outside agencies. We learned of specific

instructions communicated by the Superintendent of the Facility to staff members

prohibiting them from contacting external agencies without specific prior Superintendent

approval.67 Thus, we concluded that the legislative testimony of Mr. Lumpee failed to

accurately portray the reality of the situation at the MDRJDC.

For comparison purposes, we decided to visit the Broward Regional Juvenile

Detention Center (hereinafter “BRJDC”). When we toured the BRJDC, we noted that a

different system for contacting 911 was in use. Specifically, each room populated by

detainees, staff, or both, had an intercom on the wall that could be pressed to instantly

connect with Central Control. Engaging the intercom in this manner instantly allowed

66 We were aware that Miami-Dade Regional Juvenile Detention Center Facility Operating Procedure 7.13

requires that 911 be “ . . .called by the shift supervisor as needed.”

14

Central Control to view the room via a surveillance camera and to assess the situation. It

also permitted verbal contact via the intercom.

We were disturbed at the looming potential for both staff and detainee

emergencies in MDRJDC. We firmly believe that emergency situations require

emergency measures. We observed first-hand the efficiency of the system implemented

in the BRJDC. We tested it and determined it was the best means of insuring direct,

immediate contact with Central Control, and thus with 911. We further believe that each

staff member should have direct access to 911 from all areas of the facility populated by

detainees or staff.

We recommend that the MDRJDC immediately install an intercom system

comparable to the system currently in place in the BRJDC. As an immediate

alternative during the installation process of the intercom system, we recommend that

the current Facility Operating Procedures be modified immediately to provide for any

employee noting an emergency situation to have unimpeded direct access to 911. This

would require Facility Operating Procedures to reflect that any employee who

perceives an emergency situation, must, as a matter of responsibility, call 911. This

responsibility should, in our opinion, exist separate and apart from the mandates

assigned to any medical personnel. Further, as a practical measure, we believe that a

telephone system must be implemented in the facility in which each area populated by

detainees is equipped with direct access to 911. Finally, we recommend that current

Facility Operating Procedures be re-written to require detention workers to first

contact 911 in an emergency situation, and only then to contact Central Control.

We recommend that procedures be implemented requiring that on those

occasions when medical personnel order emergency transport, either Central Control

or detention workers are required to contact 911 within one minute. This should not

be problematic, given either the implementation of direct access to 911 from each

module or the installation of an intercom allowing for direct contact with Central

Control. Together, we believe that when a human being is suffering and a life hangs

67 We learned of an altercation that occurred between two detention workers. An external law enforcement

agency was contacted by staff following the altercation. The Superintendent of the facility became angry

and notified the staff members that all incidents should be handled within the facility.

15

in the balance, the decision to call 911 should be immediate and without

contemplation.

V. OVERCROWDING IN THE FACILITY

We were amazed to learn that many Department of Juvenile Justice secure

detention facilities in the State of Florida are populated beyond the recommended

capacity. Statewide, ten of twenty-five detention centers operated above one hundred

percent capacity during 2001-2002.68 In Miami-Dade County, the Regional Juvenile

Detention Center had an average utilization rate of one hundred and thirty-five percent in

2001-2002.69 Thus, despite the fact that the operating capacity of the facility was 226

detainees, the average daily population was 304 detainees.70

The obvious result of this overpopulation is overcrowding and shared quarters.

The less obvious result is the staffing shortages we observed firsthand. Overcrowding

renders detention difficult to manage and not as safe for residents and staff as a facility

operating at recommended capacity.71 Residents spend more time in lockdown. When

staff members “must focus primarily on safety and security, effective intervention and

treatment are compromised.”72 Staffing shortages may result in suicidal detainees being

left unattended for significant time periods and may increase escape attempts. In the

MDRJDC, specifically, the overcrowding has resulted in such problems as the failure to

provide one operable shower for every nine youths, as required pursuant to Quality

Assurance Standards.73

While we heard testimony, provided during the Legislative Public Hearings that

overcrowding could be attributed to increased stays in secure detention, we were aware of

68 Detention Services, 2003 Outcome Evaluation Report at 31.

69 Id. We did note that in Department of Juvenile Justice, Response to Subpoena Duces Tecum dated

October 23, 2003, the average population was stated to be 251 during 2002-2003.

70 Id.

71 JAIBG Bulletin at 3. In the course of our investigation, we learned of an incident that occurred on

February 11, 2003 in which a Guardian Ad Litem attorney visited a detainee at the MDRJDC. When the

attorney arrived at the facility, the JDO on the detainee’s module did not have a key to open the detainee’s

cell. It took approximately ten minutes for the JDO to retrieve the key that matched that cell from

elsewhere in the facility. The attorney, rightfully, was deeply concerned regarding the ability of the staff to

release the inmate in an expeditious manner in a fire or emergency situation.

72 Id.

73 Department of Juvenile Justice, Bureau of Quality Assurance Report (2002), 3.03 (page 9).

16

the fact that statewide, the average stay in secure detention in 2001-2002 was 13.04 days.

This number reflected a decrease from the average length of stay in 2000-2001 of 13.27

days. In Miami-Dade County, the decrease was greater. The average length of stay in

secure detention from 2001-2002 was 15.04 days, while from 2002-2003, it was 14.91

days.74

Despite the persistent issue of overcrowding in the facility, the MDRJDC does not

have a contingency plan for overcrowding/group arrest. In facilities in which such a plan

exists, operating procedures define critical population levels and set forth counteractive

measures. Further, allowances may be made for detainees to be transported to a nearby

facility in situations of severe overcrowding.75 In the BRJDC, a “Contingency Plan for

Overcrowding/Group Arrest” is carefully delineated within the Facility Operating

Procedures.76 Specifically, the plan sets forth that whenever the population in the facility

exceeds the available bed space, the superintendent or designee will perform, at a

minimum, the following actions: (1) notify the Southern Regional Office, Human

Service program administrator, juvenile court judges, court unit, Office of the Public

Defender, and Office of the State Attorney; (2) if the population issue persists, notify the

Regional Director, Assistant Secretary of Programs, and the Deputy Secretary of

Operations; (3) call in staff to work overtime at a ratio of one staff per ten detainees

exceeding the recommended number of detainees; (4) review the capacity of home

detention; and (5) request expedited placement from commitment managers.77

While we are aware of the waiting periods associated with entry into many

residential programs, we are confident that increased efficiency regarding the

performance by medical staff of physicals, mental health assessments, and the

coordination of transportation efforts will decrease the length of time that detainees spend

awaiting entry into these programs.