COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Institution Agrees To Changes Following Matthew Goodman Death

By Dave Reynolds, Inclusion Daily Express

July 7, 2005

TRENTON, NEW JERSEY--The New Jersey institution where 14-year-old Matthew Goodman was restrained before his February 2002 death has agreed to make staff improvements and other changes in a settlement with the state Child Advocate's Office.

According to Thursday's Star-Ledger, the Child's Advocate Office reviewed 150,000 pages of records from 50 allegations of abuse or neglect at Bancroft Neurohealth Inc., of Haddonfield. Investigators cited inadequate staffing levels, a lack of proper supervision, poor medical care, and an inability to properly conduct internal investigations.

Bancroft has agreed to raise staffing levels; randomly monitor employee behaviors; improve internal abuse and neglect investigations; improve medical care; and video record staff-to-resident interactions where allowed by parents. The Child's Advocate Office will hire an independent expert to monitor the changes for at least six month.

Assemblyman Eric Munoz said the agreement did not go far enough. He called for the state to withhold $125,000 in state aid set to go to Bancroft this year.

"The state should not continue to subsidize neglectful and substandard care," said Munoz, who is a medical doctor.

In the fall of 2002, Munoz sponsored "Matthew's Law", a proposal to limit the use of physical restraints. The measure was named after Goodman, who had autism and was a resident at The Lindens, an institution for 60 youths with developmental disabilities run by Bancroft. Goodman died of aspiration pneumonia, acute respiratory distress and a blood infection.

Goodman's mother, Janice Roach, claimed that the excessive use of restraints and heavy medication at Lindens weakened her son's immune system. She pointed to evidence that Matthew was placed in restraints for hours at a time -- sometimes overnight -- along with a medical report that showed the teen lost 23 pounds in the final six days of his life.

 

 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008