
Long gets six years,
Hounshell gets indicted, Arpaio gets re-elected
In
light of welldocumented abuse of office, countless lawsuits and no
accountability for an extraordinarily high body count
June 1, 2005By Linda Bentley
PHOENIX – Last week, Charles F. Long, director of the Buffalo
Soldiers toughlove youth camp, was sentenced to six years for
reckless manslaughter in the death of 14-year-old Anthony Haynes,
and five years for aggravated assault for holding a knife to the
chest of Nicholas Conner, while threatening to “gut him like a
fish.” Eight other counts alleging child abuse ended up in a
mistrial. Long will be serving his terms concurrently.
Last Wednesday, Apache County Sheriff Brian Hounshell was
indicted on two counts of misuse of public money, a class 4 felony;
one count of theft, a class 3 felony, a class 2 felony; and one
count of fraudulent schemes and artifices.
Although he maintains his innocence and attributes the charges
to false accusations made by disgruntled employees during his 2004
re-election campaign, if convicted, Hounshell could spend up to 10
years in prison.
An announcement issued by the Arizona Attorney General’s Office
stated, “The charges stem from an investigation into allegations
that Hounshell misappropriated from Apache County more than $8,000
in public monies and equipment for his own personal use or benefit
between 2000 and 2004.” Then there’s Maricopa County Sheriff Joe
Arpaio, the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America, and his
close circle of thugs.
They still walk free and unscathed after more than a decade of
well-documented accounts of his abuse of power in office.
Arpaio, who would be more fittingly dubbed America’s most
sue-able sheriff, is named as a defendant in more than 1,600 U.S.
District Court cases, a record no other sheriff in America can hold
a candle to.
Employees have been caught red-handed on video of wrongdoing,
but Arpaio denies wrongdoing at every turn and simply dismisses it,
even if it caused the death of an inmate.
Charles F. Long
Arpaio was recently interviewed by a British TV station.
After viewing the video of Charles Agster, who died of
positional asphyxia after being placed in a restraint chair while
handcuffed, the reporter read to Arpaio from his own policy manual.
It clearly stated inmates should never be placed in a restraint
chair while handcuffed as it could cause positional asphyxia.
Arpaio said, “I don’t know anything about that. All I know is we
didn’t do anything wrong.” Agster’s parents are suing.
Scott Norberg died the same way several years before and that
lawsuit cost taxpayers over $8 million.
Blind inmate Brian Crenshaw had a broken neck and broken toes,
but died from a perforated intestine after he was beat up by three
guards and then dragged to a cell where he was left isolated and
ignored for days.
Arpaio dismissed all that declaring, “The man fell off a bunk,”
as the cause of Crenshaw’s death.
When Long was being charged with eight counts of child abuse,
Arpaio proclaimed, “Those kids didn’t get those bruises from falling
off a platform.” Crenshaw’s family is suing Arpaio. A lot of people
are suing Arpaio.
Arpaio believes the high death toll comes with the territory.
“You’re bound to lose some,” he says.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Arpaio’s abuse of office is flagrant, especially when it comes
to political foes. He wreaked havoc on the lives of Tom Bearup, Dan
Saban and their families, just for running against him, and Jim
Cozzolino and his family because he was Bearup’s campaign manager
the first time around and very vocal about his disdain for Arpaio.
Cozzolino
says he was “dogged by Leo Driving Hawk” from MCSO Internal Affairs,
had deputies picking through his trash and had his Pantera
wrongfully seized.
Dan Saban recently filed a complaint against Arpaio and the ABC
Channel 15 affiliate for their collusion in airing a story, while
Saban was running against Arpaio in the primary election, about an
un-credible allegation that Saban raped his stepmother some 32 years
ago.
Arpaio insisted on pursuing the investigation even though the
seven-year statute of limitations had long run out.
Reporter Rob Koebel received the sheriff’s report on a
confidential and exclusive basis. So exclusive, Saban was not even
able to obtain a copy of the report given to Koebel.
When Bearup ran against Arpaio, Arpaio had Bearup and his family
placed under surveillance.
Bearup’s son Patrick is in jail facing a murder charge. Patrick
has consistently held his innocence.
While awaiting trial, Patrick has been housed in the mental ward
at Madison Street Jail with the lights on 24 hours a day and
instructions to wake him every 15 minutes, even though doctors noted
Patrick was neither mentally disturbed nor suicidal.
Sheriff Brian Hounshell
Another notation in his file revealed Patrick was being housed
in the mental ward by order of Arpaio.
Patrick talked to a reporter about it.
Arpaio doesn’t like political foes, “dime-droppers” and anyone
who talks to the press. And, punishment was swift.
The day after the article appeared in the paper, Patrick was
swept out of his cell and transported, without telling Patrick or
anyone else where he was going.
He was transported to Navajo County Jail.
In court, testimony revealed Arpaio requested the transfer for
“political reasons,” arranged by a simple phone call. No paperwork,
no explanation.
Again, the specific procedures, as per MCSO’s policy manual for
transporting inmates, requiring paperwork stating, at the minimum,
the inmate’s name, classification and reason for the transfer, were
not followed either.
Court dates came and went for Patrick at Maricopa County
Superior Court, while he sat in Navajo County Jail. He had no way to
contact his attorney and neither county took responsibility for
transporting Patrick to his court appearances.
Judge Granville acknowledged Patrick’s sixth amendment rights
had been violated, but he never found Arpaio or anyone else
responsible.
By court order, Patrick, held since November 2003, was
transported back to Maricopa County Jail to await trial, which has
now been given a “New Last Day” of Sept 9, 2005.
Arpaio calls everyone in jail “crooks.” Meanwhile, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was granted emergency
orders by U.S.
District Court Judge Earl Carroll placing Driving Hawk, who
still works for Arpaio in internal affairs, under a restraining
order and receivership for his part in a nationwide $88 million
investment scam.
In its complaint the SEC states, “The Defendants directly or
indirectly, singly or in concert with others, in the offer and sale
of securities ... employed devices, schemes or artifices to defraud;
... obtained money or property by means of untrue statements of
material fact or omissions and ... engaged in transactions,
practices or courses of business which operate or would operate as a
fraud or deceit.” Arpaio sees nothing wrong with Driving Hawk’s
continued employment or assignment to internal affairs.
After Arpaio totaled his county-owned Ford Crown Victoria in the
Osco Drug parking lot in Fountain Hills on Saturday, April 2, the
72-year-old offered more denial.
According to Maricopa County Risk Management Auto Loss Notice’s
description of the accident, Arpaio was “attempting to park his
vehicle in a parking space when the vehicle would not stop and
subsequently hit the curb and ran over a large boulder and century
plant.” Deputy R.T. Bierwalter’s narrative states, “... the front
bumper was damaged along with the two front tires were flat, the
radiator was leaking fluid, the driveshaft was broken in half, the
front suspension appeared to be damaged and the rear driver side
quarterpanel appeared to have been creased.
Arpaio insists he did nothing wrong and the car was at fault,
even though all evidence points to him stepping on the accelerator
instead of the break pedal, catapulting the vehicle into the
landscaping where a large boulder apparently stopped the car.
Why hasn’t anyone questioned Arpaio’s use of a county-owned
vehicle for personal use? Why hasn’t anyone held Arpaio accountable
for using a county-owned vehicle and county employees to attend
political events, not just locally but in Gila County as well? Why
has no one held Arpaio accountable for the money he collects
autographing his famous pink underwear? Are tax dollars used to
silk-screen his name in gold on those boxers? Where is the cash
deposited? Why has no one required Arpaio to provide an explanation
as to how he was able to purchase over $750,000 in real estate with
cash? Why is Arpaio immune to accountability while others are
indicted or go to prison for far less serious offenses? How high
does the inmate death toll need to be and how much taxpayer money
needs to be converted to his personal use before the attorney
general investigates Arpaio? And, why does the legislature lay
dormant when impeachment is within their grasp?
|