COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
 HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS  │  PROGRAM NEWS  │  STORIES │  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION  │ SITE MAP │  LINKS & RESOURCES
  _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  │ JUVENILE JUSTICE  │ MENTAL HEALTH │ LIGHTER SIDE │  EN FRANCAIS  │ COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Charges Dropped, For Now, in Death of Boys Ranch Teen

By Heather Urquides
The Arizona Daily Star
January 16, 1999

Pinal County prosecutors agreed to dismiss manslaughter and child-abuse charges against five former Arizona Boys Ranch employees in connection with the death of a California teen last year.

They will present the same charges to a Superior Court judge in an as-yet-unscheduled preliminary hearing.

Prosecutors agreed to remand the case after defense motions maintained there were at least 50 errors with the grand jury that indicted the five in late September in connection with the death of Nicholaus Contreraz, 16.

He died March 2 after being forced to exercise at the paramilitary boot camp in Oracle. An autopsy showed he died of an undiagnosed lung condition.

A grand jury indicted nurse Linda Babb, 46, and work specialists Troy Michael Jones, 28, Geoffrey Sean Lewis, 25, Michael Martin Moreno, 32, and Montgomery Clayton Hoover, 31.

``We've reviewed their argument and rather than taking the time to litigate this issue, we're just going to say we agree and go back and reargue this,'' said Charles Ratcliff, Pinal County Attorney's Office spokesman.

Jones' attorney, Michael L. Piccarreta, called the move ``a big victory for the Boys Ranch and also a tacit admission that the case should not have been indicted.''

Ratcliff stressed, however, that the office was not giving up on the case, just agreeing to re-present the case for charges.

``There seems to be a technical error,'' he said. ``It hasn't been confirmed where it may lie, but it definitely was not in our presentation.''

Ratcliff said he could not be more specific on the error.

Stephen M. Weiss, Babb's attorney, said prosecutors may be referring to the judge's failure to inform grand jury members of all their obligations and duties.

``It appeared that a couple of the grand jurors professed to have prior knowledge of problems at the Boys Ranch - having said that, they didn't remove themselves from the case, nor did the prosecutors make any inquiry to those jurors of what they potentially knew.''

Prosecutors have not released the roles each worker is accused of taking in the boy's death.

Court records show that authorities claimed Babb failed to diagnose the teen's lung condition.

``The bottom line is No. 1 - she's not a doctor,'' Weiss said. ``Based upon what I understand what she saw would not have given her any reason to think he had that kind of condition.''

Arizona Boys Ranch outlines its program on its Web site.

 

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008