COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Patient death highlights question about restraints

Associated Press

The suffocation death of a 7-year-old patient at a northwestern Wisconsin counseling center has highlighted the question of when to use physical restraints on children.

Angellika Arndt died at a Minneapolis hospital on May 26, a day after police were called to the Northwest Counseling and Guidance Clinic in Rice Lake on a report that she was unresponsive.

Staff members at the clinic had restrained the Ladysmith girl because of behavioral issues, police said.

Arndt died from complications of chest compression, which caused lack of air from a restraint hold she was placed in by staff members, Barron County District Attorney Angela Holmstrom has said.

The state Department of Health and Family Services investigated and found the staff had restrained Arndt nine times for one to two hours.

Clinic officials say the staff obeyed current laws and acted appropriately in restraining Arndt face down. Denison Tucker, clinic president, has said staff members use the particular hold only when a child is in danger of harming someone.

But Mary Beth Kelley, a former special education teacher, said staff members should never have placed Arndt on her stomach.

"There's been enough research out there, enough deaths, that I'm surprised anyone would still use that as a practice," said Kelley, now on the faculty of the special education program at the University of Minnesota.

Anne Gearity, a clinical social worker with the Washburn Child Guidance Center in Minneapolis, called the restraint "total unacceptable."

"Whatever happened, they lost control," Gearity said.

A Cornell University study found 45 child or adolescent fatalities involved physical or mechanical restraints between 1993 and 2003.

According to a brochure from Milwaukee-based Crisis Prevention Institute, which trains schools and other facilities in how to deal with challenging children, "especially dangerous positions" include face-down floor restraints.

Tucker said there is no uniform standard on that position.

"That really is the difficulty in this. There's quite a range of opinion," Tucker said.

Wisconsin law requires staff members at treatments centers not to restrain patients "except for emergency situations" or as part of a treatment program.

Charlie Kyte, executive director of Minnesota Association of School Administrators, said children with behavioral problems are a challenge to staff.

"I'd have a hard, hard time imagining that any adults were restraining this child for that amount of time unless the child was really out of control," he said. "My guess is they were doing their best to calm this child when this tragedy happened."

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008