COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Martin Anderson's parents complain about lack of action in case

BY MARC CAPUTO
September 27, 2006

mcaputo@MiamiHerald.com

Martin Lee Anderson's family might have to wait until after the Nov. 7 election -- or even a year after their boy's death at a Panama City boot camp -- to see if any of the guards will be charged.

Martin's parents and their attorney, Benjamin Crump, said today that they also wanted to meet again with Gov. Jeb Bush, but he refused.

Crump said the family was informed by the special prosecutor probing the case that he might file charges in the coming months, if ever. Crump said the prosecutor, Mark Ober, had earlier told him and others that charges would come this month.

Ober said in a written statement that ''I understand and sympathize with the frustration expressed by the family'' and that his ''office has made significant progress'' in the case, but he ``cannot give a definitive timeline, (and) the investigation will not be complete until I am satisfied that we have gathered and analyzed all relevant information.''

A spokesman for Bush said the governor, who signed an act cracking down on boot camps after Martin's death and had met with the family in the past, could not meet on such short notice with the family because his work schedule was booked up.

Crump said the family just wanted 15 minutes of Bush's time. Gina Jones said she wanted to ask the governor ''how would you feel'' if his son had died in a similar circumstance and no arrests had been made.

''The people should be outraged,'' Crump said, noting the scrum of boot camp guards were videotaped punching, kneeing and body-slamming the 14-year-old boy in his final hours Jan. 5.

An initial autopsy of Martin performed by Bay County Medical Examiner Charles Siebert -- done at the direction of the sheriff who ran the camp -- said the teen died of natural causes from complications of sickle-cell trait, a blood disorder.

A second autopsy -- performed at the direction of Bush, who also appointed Ober to the case -- found Martin died not from the apparent beating or sickle-cell trait, but due to asphyxiation, probably because of the ammonia capsules the guards shoved in his face to revive him after he collapsed during forced exercise.

Attorneys for the guards say their clients did nothing wrong and that Siebert's initial autopsy clears them.

But following the May release of the second autopsy by Tampa Medical Examiner Vernard Adams, the state Medical Examiner's Commission, at the request of Attorney General Charlie Crist, found a number of technical flaws with other autopsies performed by Siebert. He has appealed their ruling, saying the review itself was flawed and too nitpicking.

Crump said Siebert's appeal ``adds insult to injury.''

Crump said Martin's parents are watching as ``everybody's going along fine. And every day they're dealing with this pain and agony knowing their son was killed and tortured the last 30 minutes of his life. And not one person has been held accountable after 10 months.''

Democrat U.S. Rep. Jim Davis of Tampa, running against the Republican Crist for governor, issued a statment pledging his support in the case.

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008