COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

Mom got 2nd chance with son
However, she blew it, latest arrest in reported beating of boy suggests

August 18, 2007
By Laurie Roberts
 


This week's candidate for mother of the year: Tina Lynn Tatum.

When we last saw Tatum in May 2005, she was in court charged with child abuse, sobbing to a judge how it wasn't her fault that her boyfriend killed her baby. This, even though she knew he'd been shaking the infant and had admitted to smacking her older son around herself.

"I've been through hell since this happened," she tearfully told the judge. "I know that nothing is ever going to bring my son back and I have to live with it the rest of my life. I shouldn't have to suffer any more."

These days, Tatum's out of jail and apparently suffering still. Her latest bout of misery came Sunday when police say she beat her surviving son bloody in a Mesa Wal-Mart and then dragged him off in front of horrified customers.

So how could this happen, you ask? How could someone with her past even have a son to use as a punching bag?

Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas was so outraged by the matter he called a press conference.

"It is very disturbing that a person who was involved in the violent death of one child apparently was given unmonitored custody of a second child," Thomas said. "The current system for protecting children from violence and live-in adults is not working."

So says the man whose own office offered a deal to the woman two years ago, reducing her role in the baby's death to attempted child abuse.

In 2003, Tatum was living with Pedro Peralta and her two sons by other boyfriends, a 5-year-old and 3-month-old Anthony Nieves.

On the night the baby died, Peralta admitted that he had shaken Anthony, but Tatum appeared more concerned with her beloved than her dead baby.

"What am I supposed to do without you?" she told Peralta, in an exchange taped by Phoenix police. "You mean (expletive) everything to me. And I can't (expletive) do without you."

Tatum refused to cooperate with police and no charges were brought at the time. It took 10 months and another dead child - by then Peralta had moved in with another woman and smothered her son - before the pair was prosecuted: Peralta for murder and Tatum for child abuse for failing to protect her infant son.

In 2005, Thomas' office offered Tatum a deal: Plead guilty to attempted child abuse and we'll stipulate a year in jail and lifetime probation. The plea also required that she get counseling for domestic violence and have no "victim" contact without a probation officer's approval - though, given that the victim was dead, such contact seemed highly unlikely.

Tatum took the deal. Meanwhile, Child Protective Services turned the surviving son over to her father and closed the case. The agency says it never again got a report of a problem.

When Tatum got out of jail in spring 2006, she went to live with her father and son. Her probation officer notified the court, saying she could find no orders from the judge barring such contact. "Therefore," she wrote, "this officer will allow her to remain in her father's residence with this son unless the court opposes this arrangement."

It didn't.

Mike Goss, a spokesman for the Maricopa County Adult Probation Department, said they had no reason to believe she would abuse the boy.

"No information was presented to the court from either CPS or the pre-sentence investigation that she was a danger to the child as a perpetrator," he told me. "The danger was that she failed to protect him from this other guy."

Court records indicate, meanwhile, that Peralta told police in 2003 that Tatum had drawn blood when hitting her older son in the face. Tatum denied it, saying she only smacks the boy. "I don't ever close my fist to my kids," she said.

Tatum, 29, was arrested Sunday after Wal-Mart customers say she closed her fist and repeatedly slugged her now 10-year-old son, bloodying his nose then dragging him off. This, reportedly because of an argument over a T-shirt.

Tatum, by the way, had just completed 51 of 52 court-mandated counseling sessions for domestic violence.

Reach Roberts at laurie.roberts@arizonarepublic.com. Read her blog at robertsblog.azcentral.com.

 

Isabelle Zehnder   

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008