COALITION AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED CHILD ABUSE
HEADLINE NEWS                                                                                                                                                                                                             CAICA EN FRANÇAIS
 

CAICA     HOME   │   NEWS    PROGRAM NEWS   STORIES  DEATHS  │   WWASPS   │  PARENTS' CORNER  │  MISSION   SITE MAP   LINKS & RESOURCES
 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

              AUTISM  │ LITIGATION  │  LEGISLATION  JUVENILE JUSTICE  MENTAL HEALTH LIGHTER SIDE   EN FRANCAIS  COMMENTS  │ LIST SERVE  │  BLOGS  
 

 

news-press.com

Bay County examiner fighting to keep job Ruling controversial in boot-camp death

July 16, 2007
By Stephen D. Price


PANAMA CITY — Bay County medical examiner Dr. Charles Siebert, fired June 13, is still on the job and determined to stay there despite the political firestorm surrounding him and his work.

He has been appointed temporarily by his chief supporter, State Attorney Steve Meadows, who openly disputes the findings of the Medical Examiners Commission that voted to dismiss Siebert.

“Nobody is perfect,” said Siebert, 45. “I’m getting attacked for mistakes that everybody’s making, but I’m being singled out.”

Siebert intends to fight to keep his job against evidence of inaccuracy in his work and charges that he violated state law in his autopsy of Martin Lee Anderson. His examination concluded Anderson died of natural causes. The teen died Jan. 6, 2006, the day after surveillance video showed him being kneed, pinned to the ground, forced to breathe ammonia capsules and forcibly marched around an exercise yard by drill instructors at a Bay County juvenile boot camp.

Siebert adamantly disputes the findings of a subsequent autopsy that found Anderson suffocated to death.

It’s a dispute that Meadows said will be settled by the Oct. 3 criminal trial of seven drill instructors and one nurse from the boot camp, charged with felony aggravated manslaughter of a child. The judge in that trial has already indicated there may be difficulty seating a jury in Bay County, where support for the accused and Siebert both run high.

At court dates and news conferences, organized groups of Siebert backers show up in solidarity.

Elsewhere around the state, the Bay County medical examiner since 2003 is more of a lightning rod. Siebert determined 14-year-old Anderson died from complications of a blood disorder, sickle-cell trait, a finding that set a match to the fuse of the political powderkeg of Anderson’s case, with protest marches on the Capitol that included the Revs. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson and lawmakers calling for criminal charges.

Those pressures in part led to State Attorney Mark Ober being named a special prosecutor in the case by then-Gov. Jeb Bush, an exhumation of Anderson’s body and a second autopsy being performed by Hillsborough medical examiner Dr. Vernard Adams.

Adams concluded Anderson had his mouth clamped shut by drill instructors, was forced to breathe ammonia and suffocated.

Siebert dismisses criticisms against him and said the trial will vindicate him. Among the findings and allegations lined up against him:

A Medical Examiners Commission investigation concluded he could not have examined Anderson as described in his autopsy report, part of findings it said constituted probable cause Siebert has violated state law.

On June 13, the commission voted to fire Siebert, a move not final until he has a hearing to defend himself, which he plans to do.

State Attorney Meadows said Siebert is a victim of “character assassination.”

Meadows reappointed Siebert on an interim basis beginning July 1, while a search committee looks for a permanent replacement.

That appointment has led to a political showdown between the state attorney and the commission that oversees medical examiners. Its chairman, Dr. Stephen Nelson, said the move is “being researched by our general counsel” to determine the commission’s options.

Meadows said no one has proved Siebert did anything wrong and that the embattled medical examiner hasn’t had a chance to defend himself.

Closer looks have revealed problems for the man who came to Florida for a fellowship for then chief medical examiner in Miami-Dade County, Joseph Davis.

After the fellowship, Siebert was hired as an assistant medical examiner, and worked his way around the state in Palm Beach County and Pinellas County, rising in both to deputy medical examiner before coming to Bay County as its chief in 2003.

A Medical Examiners Commission audit of Siebert’s work in Bay County cited an autopsy on a woman in which he described in a report “the prostate gland and testes are unremarkable.”

Siebert said it was a clerical error — two reports got typed on top of each other. Last year’s investigation said Siebert was “energetic, hard working and diligent,” but added that his work lacked accuracy and detail.

Siebert, who makes about $200,000 annually, said the community supports him — but he isn’t digging roots in Panama City.

“I’ve looked elsewhere (for work),” said Siebert.

Siebert said his critics are part of a political network formed against him because his Anderson autopsy is “not one that fits the agenda of people that obviously want these guards prosecuted.”

Gov. Charlie Crist and the Legislature awarded Anderson’s family $5 million in a settlement earlier this year.

Siebert said Adams’s autopsy was not only wrong, but “I think it is impossible . . . The ammonia capsule, it doesn’t replace oxygen. It doesn’t stop you from breathing.”

Dr. Edward Klatt, a professor of pathology at Florida State University with no ties to the case, disagreed. He said the ammonia capsules could change breathing patterns, making it easier to suffocate, and block oxygen.

Moreover, Klatt said cases of death from sickle cell trait are extremely rare and it’s most often used as a cause of death when no other reason can be found.

In May another investigation by a Medical Examiners Commission probable cause panel concluded Siebert didn’t examine all he said he had in the Anderson autopsy, and found four counts where he violated two state statutes — misrepresenting information upon an opinion as medical examiner, and negligence.

For example, the panel’s report said in the Anderson autopsy Siebert described the boy’s thyroid gland as “red-brown and not enlarged,” as part of his overall examination.

But according to Adams, who did the second Anderson autopsy, the thyroid gland was obscured by still-attached muscles and he said, “Dr. Siebert could not have viewed the thyroid to determine its coloration.”

Siebert said those muscles covered the top of the thyroid, but not the sides which he viewed.

The FSU professor, Klatt, said, “those muscles have to be taken away for the thyroid gland to be seen.”

Siebert’s dismissal after the probable-cause finding was an escalation of the commission’s charges against Siebert. In January, without admitting any wrongdoing, Siebert agreed to have his work reviewed by Dr. Barbara Wolf, a deputy medical examiner based in Fort Myers, as part of a probation agreement.

In a May 23 commission meeting some members were upset at Siebert for “bucking authority,” and not cooperating with Wolf. They voted not to renew his contract.

Siebert said he is confident he will persuade his detractors in the administrative hearing, and that the criminal trial will prove he was right about Anderson’s autopsy.

Meadows chairs the search committee to find a permanent medical examiner for District 14, and said he will not rule out Siebert as a possible nominee.

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER, WARNINGS, AND NOTICE TO READERS: This website does not represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information, content collectively, the "Materials") contained on, distributed through, or linked, downloaded or accessed from any of the services contained on this website (the "Service"). None of the contributors, sponsors, administrators or anyone else connected with this website in any way whatsoever can be responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate or libelous information or for your use of the information contained in these web pages. All information provided using this website is only intended to be general summary information to the public.

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

REFERRALS: CAICA is not a referral agency. CAICA does not refer to or promote facilities or transport companies for children or teens. CAICA warns parents that the parent pay / parent choice programs ie. Residential Treatment Centers, Therapeutic Boarding Schools, Behavior Modification Programs, Christian Programs, Positive Peer Culture Programs, etc., are not regulated by the Federal Government and that it is a "Buyer Beware" industry. CAICA provides the following for parents: Message to Parents, Help for Distraught and Desperate Parents, and Questions to Ask and Warning Signs.

© 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008